Tree Frog Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 20 hours ago, stephanier.1765 said: We saw an interview with his lawyer last night where he said that he has seen defendants with more evidence against them get off scot free. Really? Really you have? I know the DA is just doing his due diligence but comments like that make me want to smack him. That could be PR and bluffing, trying to offset what all the potential jurors are hearing in the news. It doesn't necessarily mean it's true. (I think that's the cynic in me coming out...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravin Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 The statements I've seen from his lawyers (given to AP; example of how they're quoted here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/01/17/jayme-closs-case-patterson-lawyers-motive-killings-kidnapping/2601592002/ ) were all very appropriate. I suspect what stephanier.1765 may have seen is some random defense attorney the network consulted who isn't actually representing Patterson. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.