Jump to content

Menu

The Austin Bomber is dead


Katy
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want people to appreciate that it was unfair to publicly denigrate the man’s motives/character based on nothing, wrong to reassure the public based on nothing, and that we are not generally devoting the resources we should to domestic threats (I think that’s because it doesn’t suit the preferred narrative WRT terroristic behavior YMMV).

Thank you for this clear statement. It helps me to better understand your pov.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want people to appreciate that it was unfair to publicly denigrate the man’s motives/character based on nothing, wrong to reassure the public based on nothing, and that we are not generally devoting the resources we should to domestic threats (I think that’s because it doesn’t suit the preferred narrative WRT terroristic behavior YMMV).

 

1.) You are drastically overstating the "denigrating" of his character.

2.) Why not reassure the public initially?  Are you seriously saying when the first bomb went off they should have shouted "Everyone panic!" when they had no reason to suspect a serial bomber?

3.) What does investigating domestic terror threats have to do with these bombings?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the absence of other evidence, LEOs were unable to wrap their heads around the idea that a black man could be subject to a random act of violence so they pursued every other cork brained idea they could think of.

Except they literally did entertain the idea that he was subject to a random act of violence.  It was one of many theories they had since there was very little to go on and nothing that would've led them to the actual bomber.  They labeled it a suspicious death from the start (and changed it to homicide once the second bomb went off and they strongly suspected they were dealing with a serial bomber).  But for that 10 days, they tried to come up with any reason they could for that first bomb because that's appropriate police work.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is pushing for rights to be ignored. Investigatory resources don’t necessarily equal violations but I see folks trying to conflate the two. It’s a matter of priorities. In this case, you had a bomb, not a run of the mill crime. Ignoring that fact distorts the conversation.

 

That's right - a bomb. SOP is to call in the ATF to assist with an investigation (they are really good at this) and investigate accordingly.  Considering serial bombers are not common and most bomb incidents are one-offs, I can't see why you are so convinced something was done incorrectly.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is pushing for rights to be ignored. Investigatory resources don’t necessarily equal violations but I see folks trying to conflate the two. It’s a matter of priorities. In this case, you had a bomb, not a run of the mill crime. Ignoring that fact distorts the conversation.

 

You brought up COINTELPRO which did involve violations, and when I pointed out that domestic terror investigations have limitations that international do not you brushed it off by saying rights are violated anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.) You are drastically overstating the "denigrating" of his character.

2.) Why not reassure the public initially? Are you seriously saying when the first bomb went off they should have shouted "Everyone panic!" when they had no reason to suspect a serial bomber?

3.) What does investigating domestic terror threats have to do with these bombings?

There’s a mile’s worth of difference between everybody panic and you have nothing to worry about. Somewhere in the middle is a call for a lot of additional vigilance. And yes, you tell me my loved one blew himself up on accident over money troubles or got caught up in a drug deal and you are denigrating his character. Period and point blank.

 

Investigating domestic terror means having more eyes and ears watching for suspicious activity. We seem to think that’s the right way to respond to intl-inspired lone wolves. Good for geese-good for gander.

Edited by Sneezyone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You brought up COINTELPRO which did involve violations, and when I pointed out that domestic terror investigations have limitations that international do not you brushed it off by saying rights are violated anyway.

I brought it up as an indication if our willingness to devote resources to things we see as problematic...things we PRIORITIZE. I mentioned the violations of rights because we threw those out the window after 9/11, even domestically because...PRIORITIES. Rights violations aren’t the sticking point here. Priorities are.

Edited by Sneezyone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.) You are drastically overstating the "denigrating" of his character.

2.) Why not reassure the public initially?  Are you seriously saying when the first bomb went off they should have shouted "Everyone panic!" when they had no reason to suspect a serial bomber?

3.) What does investigating domestic terror threats have to do with these bombings?

 

I agree - especially with point # 1.

Perhaps for Sneezy, the suggestion of possible suicide is abhorrent compared to homicide. This may be why some of us are scratching our heads here.

IMO, I would be just as sad if someone took their own life or if they were murdered. Both ways of dying are horrible and imply to me someone's life was either taken or he chose to take his own life before his time. No reflection on character at all with suicide. It just tells me that someone who committed suicide was in pain and agony and did not see a solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s a mile’s worth of difference between everybody panic and you have nothing to worry about. Somewhere isn the middle is a call for additional vigilance. And yes, you tell me my loved one blew himself up on accident over money troubles it a drug deal and you are denigrating his character. Period and point blank.

 

Investigating domestic terror means having more eyes and ears watching for suspicious activity. We seem to think that’s the right way to respond to intl-inspired lone wolves. Good for geese-good for gander.

 

Actually the theory I read was he was accidentally killed by a bomb targeting a drug dealer, not him.  The police were looking into the victim which happens often in a homicide investigation because that is how you often find motive.

 

Additional vigilance for...what?  It was the first bombing and the police had little info on what happened.  There were no witnesses and limited information. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brought it up as a man indication if our willingness to devote resources to things we see as problematic...things we PRIORITIZE. I mentioned the violations of rights because we through those out the window after 9/11, even domestically because...PRIORITIES. Rights violations aren’t the sticking point here. Priorities are.

 

They are a sticking point for myself and many others.  And for successful prosecutions (example: government misconduct led to mistrials in the Bundy case).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the theory I read was he was accidentally killed by a bomb targeting a drug dealer, not him. The police were looking into the victim which happens often in a homicide investigation because that is how you often find motive.

 

Additional vigilance for...what? It was the first bombing and the police had little info on what happened. There were no witnesses and limited information.

They put out both, that he made the bomb himself and that he had money troubles and that maybe he was the unintended recipient. In any case, they had no business leaping to those conclusions. Bomb activity is not normal, typical, etc. they knew it was a random package bomb and chose to poo poo it. Who knows whether that young cellist might have been spared with additional vigilance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They put out both, that he made the bomb himself and that he had money troubles and that maybe he was the unintended recipient. In any case, they had no business leaping to those conclusions. Bomb activity is not normal, typical, etc. they knew it was a random package bomb and chose to poo poo it. Who knows whether that young cellist might have been spared with additional vigilance.

 

Bomb activity is not normal or typical but ones of that appear targeted tend not to be random either.  Which is why the police focused on the victim being targeted, having made it himself, or received a package intended for someone else.  All 3 of which are significantly more likely than a totally random package bomb.

FWIW they figured out it was a package bomb - they could not know at that time it was random.

 

When homicide investigators hear hoof beats they will always look for horses before looking for zebras.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree - especially with point # 1.

Perhaps for Sneezy, the suggestion of possible suicide is abhorrent compared to homicide. This may be why some of us are scratching our heads here.

IMO, I would be just as sad if someone took their own life or if they were murdered. Both ways of dying are horrible and imply to me someone's life was either taken or he chose to take his own life before his time. No reflection on character at all with suicide. It just tells me that someone who committed suicide was in pain and agony and did not see a solution.

Taking your own life is a choice, a selfish one, not something that is done to you. I would absolutely see someone lying about my loved one like that as defamation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bomb activity is not normal or typical but ones of that appear targeted tend not to be random either. Which is why the police focused on the victim being targeted, having made it himself, or received a package intended for someone else. All 3 of which are significantly more likely than a totally random package bomb.

FWIW they figured out it was a package bomb - they could not know at that time it was random.

 

When homicide investigators hear hoof beats they will always look for horses before looking for zebras.

What does any of that have to do with prematurely reassuring the public that they had nothing to worry about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cliven, Ryan, and Ammon - future domestic terrorists (imo). Not Ted.

You’ll get no argument from me in the misconduct with those three but I’d argue, again, that the domestic side of the house is significantly under-resourced. That’s not where the glory is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does any of that have to do with prematurely reassuring the public that they had nothing to worry about?

 

That they truly believed there was nothing to worry about?

1.) Package bombs usually are not random (not even sure I can think of a case where one was offhand).

2.) If they bomb was targeted at the victim or someone else, there would be no reason to believe anyone else was in danger.

 

I get that you want to invent reasons to criticize the APD but this just seems unreasonable.  Considering the next bomb went off 10 days later I am not sure your call for "vigilance" would have mattered.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That they truly believed there was nothing to worry about?

1.) Package bombs usually are not random (not even sure I can think of a case where one was offhand).

2.) If they bomb was targeted at the victim or someone else, there would be no reason to believe anyone else was in danger.

 

I get that you want to invent reasons to criticize the APD but this just seems unreasonable. Considering the next bomb went off 10 days later I am not sure your call for "vigilance" would have mattered.

I have no reason to invent reasons. Their lack of reasonable caution may have led to more deaths. We can agree to disagree.

Edited by Sneezyone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking your own life is a choice, a selfish one, not something that is done to you. I would absolutely see someone lying about my loved one like that as defamation.

 

I thought you came from that view point perhaps. Thank you for clarifying. Now I understand why this particular aspect is so upsetting for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no reason to invent reasons. Their lack of reasonable caution may have lead to more deaths. We can agree to disagree.

 

It sounds like an invented reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking your own life is a choice, a selfish one, not something that is done to you. I would absolutely see someone lying about my loved one like that as defamation.

 

Again - where are you reading that they thought it was a suicide?

 

First they treated it as a homicide.  But they could not find any reason anyone would want to kill him.

Second they checked into the possibility that he was mistakenly hit by a bomb intended for someone else.  They investigated that and decided that was unlikely.

Third they said it was a "suspicious death" BUT they could not rule out the possibility that it had been an accident.

 

Unless you have a source telling you otherwise, your posts are misleading and unfair.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also per Wiki the cops said on the day of the first bombing, ""we have no reason to believe this is anything beyond an isolated incident that took place at this residence, and no reason to believe this is in any way linked to a terrorist act. But we are not making any assumptions. We are conducting a thorough investigation to rule that out." 

 

That does not say "we are sure there is no further danger" or anything like that.

 

It would not be reasonable for the cops to say after every crime "you could be next, watch out" without any evidence supporting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my questions/musings...

 

I'm really torn reading the coverage about this criminal/terrorist/definitely not a "nice boy" person. Honestly, the descriptions that are supposed to terrify us as the potential foundation of his radicalization during his homeschool years are just ringing really false for me. He was part of a group with an inflammatory, "scary" sounding name - RIOT - but they were named by teenagers, who of course give everything stupid names. The group had kids who knew about guns and went to firing ranges. Um, it's Texas. Don't a LOT of older teens learn to shoot and go to gun ranges? This may be a problem for our society (or not, depending on where you stand) but doesn't strike me as "scary" by itself. Also, they didn't actually shoot as part of the group? And they talked about "dangerous" chemicals, but it doesn't sound like it was part of a program - they were teenagers. Teenagers talk about that stuff and download The Anarchist Cookbook and so forth. Most of what they did at this "scary" homeschool group was bible study and LARPing. I mean, seriously, are we supposed to be scared by teenagers larping? They just sound like normal homeschooled teens to me - quirky and teenagery.

 

But also, I think there is a real overlap between homeschoolers and some really extremist beliefs, especially racist beliefs. We all know there are homeschool curricula that attempt to whitewash slavery and peddle a view of American history that is sometimes even overtly racist. I don't want to let this guy off the hook in any way. He was almost certainly radicalized at some point. I think it really is a legitimate question to ask when that happened and whether homeschooling was part of laying the groundwork for that - even if his family aren't "like that".

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...