Carol in Cal. Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 This article is fascinating--and at odds with conventional wisdom. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/why-greenland-vikings-vanished-180962119/ 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barb_ Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 I'm falling asleep and can't finish but I'm saving the rest until tomorrow. It's really good so far! Thanks for linking 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbgrace Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 That was interesting--thanks for sharing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahW Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Nice article. But I don't understand the part where it says that the conventional wisdom is that the Norse in Greenland were dumb. In the Penguin edition of the Vinland sagas (which is not new) there's a whole discussion of the impact of the changes in Europe, and most especially the changing economic and trade policies of Denmark. Maybe McGovern didn't agree with that, and now the archaeology is changing his view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mom2att Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 I love Smithsonian Magazine! There's also a fascinating article in the same issue about a group assigned to work under the Nazis in Lithuania who escaped to freedom via a tunnel they dug through the earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minerva Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Great article! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selkie Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Thanks! Viking history is an interest of mine, so I'm looking forward to reading this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol in Cal. Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 Nice article. But I don't understand the part where it says that the conventional wisdom is that the Norse in Greenland were dumb. In the Penguin edition of the Vinland sagas (which is not new) there's a whole discussion of the impact of the changes in Europe, and most especially the changing economic and trade policies of Denmark. Maybe McGovern didn't agree with that, and now the archaeology is changing his view. What the argument is, as I understand it, is that in the past the Greenland experience was viewed as an attempt to pretty much exactly replicate the Norse cultural focus on farming in a location that turned out to be inappropriate for it, particularly once the general temperature got colder. In that view, the Greenlanders were viewed as mostly a farming economy/community that did a little hunting on the side, and also as people who would not switch to a primarily hunting community. Whereas now they are viewed as a community that did major and ecologically sensitive hunting from the very beginning, and primarily was engaged with walrus ivory and seal hunting (flexible compared with their home occupations) but used a little farming as a vehicle to make that more reasonable. This means that they were more flexible in their response to the local conditions than had previously been believed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thessa516 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 Thanks for the link to the article! We're on a Viking kick at our home. This month's National Geographic's feature story is on the Vikings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaredluvsjoanie Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 This article was fascinating. Thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.