LTBernard Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 My son has completed SSL1 and 2. I am now trying to figure out what is next. Can anyone help me with this? Leslie Quote
Insertcreativenamehere Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 How old is your son? Prima Latina is very, very basic and is mostly vocab and not as much grammar. LFC is grammar-based. Quote
Dmmetler Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 For DD, at age 6-7, LFC was just too much memorization and not enough fun. It didn't stick. What worked better was to just read Latin, first with Minimus/Minimus Secundus, and then with Cambridge, with other reading in Latin as we found it. By the time she finished working through Cambridge, she was heading into middle school, and, we jumped back to Latin Prep, which is definitely grammar/translation based, and it's worked well because she has a solid Latin vocabulary and an awareness of how it works, and is ready to pick it apart. For some kids, part-whole works well, but for mine, she needed the whole language first, and then could break it down. Quote
RootAnn Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 LfC can better be compared with Latina Christiana since Prima is so basic and gentle. Where you want to go next depends on your goals and how much your kid is interested or can handle grammar-wise. LC is pretty dry, but is well spelled out. LfC has some more fun aspects, but could be too much for a younger kid. Another option is Getting Started with Latin which is inexpensive and easy to use with kids of all ages. Quote
SeaConquest Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Sacha finished SSL2 and Minimus this past year. Our plan is to do GSWL and Minimus Secundus in 2016-2017. If we still have time left in the year, then we will probably move onto the Cambridge materials. I have tried to sell myself on LFC several times, but, after watching the videos, I think that Sacha would have the same experience as Dmmetler's daughter with it. It looks so soul-sucking with all of that chanting. I've never learned languages by chanting, even inflected languages, so I don't see why Latin requires that methodology. Sacha is normally a pretty linear-sequential learner, but I agree that a big picture/whole to parts approach to language study is far more interesting for him. After this year, we plan to move into Lively Latin or Latin Prep, along with the Cambridge materials. Quote
LTBernard Posted July 13, 2016 Author Posted July 13, 2016 Thanks everyone! Ds is 7 at this point (turning 8 in February). It looks like I have more items to check into :) Quote
SeaConquest Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Thanks everyone! Ds is 7 at this point (turning 8 in February). It looks like I have more items to check into :) Sacha is the same age -- 7 turning 8 in January, so it looks like they are working at about the same level in Latin. Please let me know what you decide in case we need to make changes. :) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.