Jump to content

Menu

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here is what the website says:

 

The complete content of this course is in the lecture notes and videos of the lectures, in the Student Workbook, and in the supplemental readings. Separate textbooks are no longer necessary. Originally written for a group of students in California, this course was based on the California text Focus on Physical Science and also on Paul Hewitt's Conceptual Physical Science.

 

Conceptual Physical Science is different from Conceptual Physics.  Aside from that, DO's physics course is a regular high school physics course, which has more math than the conceptual variety.

Edited by EKS
Posted

Here is what the website says:

 

The complete content of this course is in the lecture notes and videos of the lectures, in the Student Workbook, and in the supplemental readings. Separate textbooks are no longer necessary. Originally written for a group of students in California, this course was based on the California text Focus on Physical Science and also on Paul Hewitt's Conceptual Physical Science.

 

Conceptual Physical Science is different from Conceptual Physics.  Aside from that, DO's physics course is a regular high school physics course, which has more math than the conceptual variety.

Ahh! So it is Conceptual Physical Science, not Conceptual Physics? I did not catch that! Thanks!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...