Jump to content

Menu

Best modern British lit?


klmama
 Share

Recommended Posts

Off the top of my head 

 

Kazuo Ishiguro

Salman Rushdie 

AS Byatt 

 

 

oh & Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall 

 

Yes.  Also Ian McEwan.  For choice, I would go for:

 

Kazuo Ishiguro - Remains of the Day (set in the 1930s)

Salman Rushdie - Midnight's Children (set in the 1940s)

AS Byatt - Possession (set in 1980s plus 19th century)

Ian McEwan - Saturday - (post 9/11) or Atonement (pre-war)

Hilary Mantel - Wolf Hall ( 16th Century)

 

Other ideas:

 

JG Ballard - Empire of the Sun (WWII China under Japanese occupation)

Julian Barnes - Flaubert's Parrot (all over the place)

Jeanette Winterson - Oranges are Not the Only Fruit - (mid-century)

Zadie Smith - White Teeth (published 2000)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could look at Booker Prize winners from the last couple of decades - not all Brits, but mostly. Tends to be stuff that is modern lit classics.

 

Yes and no.  The jury changes each year and some years are.... not good.  I read the whole shortlist three years running a few years ago and they were very uneven.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might add Mark Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (because I like it, lol) and maybe Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy if that suits.

 

Gotta do Rebecca by du Maurier, but that may be older than you're looking for.  :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Ishiguro but I think it is a pretty specific taste. Never Let Me Go is good :)

Ishiguro is interesting, because each of his books is quite different. Never Let Me Go is not a favourite if mine, just because dystopian novels don't appeal, but his writing is always luminous.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the ones I've read, he has a writing style that feels quite deliberate and also somewhat understated.  My mom can't tolerate him :)

 

I love dystopian lit, but for me Never Let Me Go was not about the dystopia at all; it was just a setting used to magnify the parts of human nature he wanted to talk about.  The dystopia itself was kind of roughshod and incomplete (though a compelling enough idea); the idea at the end

 

(spoiler)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - we all complete, and no one ever has enough time - was the core of the book, imo.

 

Similarly, Le Guin (my favorite author in the whole world) criticized Ishiguro's The Buried Giant for not being, among other things, a complete enough fantasy; she found it not fully realized as fantasy.  I think she just misses the point with Ishiguro.

 

 

And that is all I have to say about that, hah :)  Avoiding answering customer service inquiries late at night!

 

Wolf Hall was good too.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...