Jump to content

Menu

Recommended Posts

Posted

I agree that R&S has plenty of writing on its own. But I found much of it is pretty dry, so we dropped the composition exercises from R&S and used WWE/WWS for explicit writing instruction.

 

Looking back, I think we probably could have just used R&S exclusively through 4th or 5th grade, then moved into WWS. I didn't love the whole narration/dictation thing for writing in elementary, but the explicit instruction in WWS has been FANTASTIC for dd.

 

If you wanted to add something to complement R&S, you could look at Kilgallon. The focus there is more on style than structure.

Posted

R&S a complete grammar *and* composition. And yes, it's dry. :-) But the writing instruction is no more dry than the grammar, so there you go. :-)

 

Have you seen R&S's scope and sequence? And sample curriculum? Because then you'd see that there's a boatload of writing. :001_smile:

Posted

R&S is so great. I've wanted something less religious, but there it is so good I am just sticking with R&S. I am adding a creative prompt weekly or bi-weekly, whatever works best. Hopefully that will combat the dryness!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...