Vida Winter Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Since I don't own either of these I thought I would ask. Are they roughly equal? Quote
coffeegal Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 They're roughly equal. Saxon 87 is similar in setup to the lower Saxon maths. It's also has more arithmetic, but still covers the algebra. Algebra 1/2 is setup like the upper Saxon math. It's slightly heavier on the algebra versus the arithmetic. Many families do one or the other, but some use both. 1 Quote
Carol in Cal. Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 87 has been beefed up quite a bit, and the newer edition is a fairly thorough pre-algebra course. I recommend using it, and then doing 1/2 only if you don't feel that your child is ready for algebra after 87. 4 Quote
stlily Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 (edited) My student is on Saxon 7/6 so we'll be right where you are, next year. Here is what is recommended in TWTM: "In recognition that many seventh graders won't be ready to start pre-algebra (Algebra 1/2), Saxon provides Math 8/7 to serve as a bridge between Math 7/6 (the sixth-grade book) and Algebra 1/2. If your sixth grader is still stumbling over the concepts in Math 7/6, don't push her into Algebra 1/2; use Saxon's alternate sequence (see the table "The Saxon Program," below). Either sequence is perfectly acceptable for a middle-grade student (TWTM pp. 259-260, third edition). The Saxon Program: Regular Versus Alternate Regular Saxon Sequence 5th - Math 6/5 6th - Math 7/6 7th - Algebra 1/2 8th - Algebra 1 Alternate Saxon Sequence 5th - Math 6/5 6th - Math 7/6 7th - Math 8/7 8th - Algebra 1/2 Hope this helps. Lily :001_smile: Edited January 16, 2016 by stlily 2 Quote
Ellie Posted January 16, 2016 Posted January 16, 2016 Since I don't own either of these I thought I would ask. Are they roughly equal? I always follow the publisher's recommendation: with current editions, students who complete Math 76 with at least an 80% average go to Math 87, then Alg. 1; students who complete Math 76 with less than 80% do Alg. 1/2, then Alg. 1. The only reason I might do both is if a child is very young and it might not be a good thing for him to be doing Alg. 1 when he's 12. :-) IOW, I don't just pick one. I follow the publisher's recommendation. 3 Quote
Vida Winter Posted January 16, 2016 Author Posted January 16, 2016 I always follow the publisher's recommendation: with current editions, students who complete Math 76 with at least an 80% average go to Math 87, then Alg. 1; students who complete Math 76 with less than 80% do Alg. 1/2, then Alg. 1. The only reason I might do both is if a child is very young and it might not be a good thing for him to be doing Alg. 1 when he's 12. :-) IOW, I don't just pick one. I follow the publisher's recommendation. Are you sure about this? It seems like if they complete 7/6 with less than 80% they would go into the slightly easier book. Do the different editions matter? We are using the older ones. Quote
tmstranger Posted January 17, 2016 Posted January 17, 2016 When we first started homeschooling, we used the placement test from Saxon. My son blew through the 8/7 section, but started struggling in the Algebra 1/2, so he started in that book. To me, knowing the way the placement test is set up, I would think that those books are not the same. That being said, I don't know what advice to give someone who has been using Saxon up to this point. We came into at that level, so no experience prior. 1 Quote
bethben Posted January 17, 2016 Posted January 17, 2016 I went from 76 to Algebra 1/2 with my 2nd ds and will go from 76 to 87 with my 3rd ds. I want to give him the option of an additional year of pre-algebra in case he needs it. Quote
Ellie Posted January 17, 2016 Posted January 17, 2016 Are you sure about this? It seems like if they complete 7/6 with less than 80% they would go into the slightly easier book. Do the different editions matter? We are using the older ones. With current editions, yes. With older editions, it's the opposite: Math 76, Alg. 1/2, Alg. 1, unless Math 76 was completed with less than an 80% average. And it isn't that one is easier than the other; it has to do with what is covered. 1 Quote
hsmom10 Posted January 17, 2016 Posted January 17, 2016 I always follow the publisher's recommendation: with current editions, students who complete Math 76 with at least an 80% average go to Math 87, then Alg. 1; students who complete Math 76 with less than 80% do Alg. 1/2, then Alg. 1. The only reason I might do both is if a child is very young and it might not be a good thing for him to be doing Alg. 1 when he's 12. :-) IOW, I don't just pick one. I follow the publisher's recommendation. This is exactly what we did. My dd did the 3rd edition of 87 as a 7th grader and is now doing Alg. 1 in 8th, and is doing really well with it. I know the old recommendation was that Alg. 1/2 was stronger than 87. I believe that to be the case if using the 2nd edition books. But that in the 3rd edition, 87 is the stronger text, and you would use Alg. 1/2 on a slower track. Quote
mschickie Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 We did 87 with dd and then Algebra 1. I wanted to make sure she had a solid foundation. here is a great article on what you should use: http://homeschoolwithsaxon.com/newsletterpage-2015.php#1015 1 Quote
Vida Winter Posted January 19, 2016 Author Posted January 19, 2016 With older editions, it's the opposite: Math 76, Alg. 1/2, Alg. 1, unless Math 76 was completed with less than an 80% average. And it isn't that one is easier than the other; it has to do with what is covered. This is what we need to follow - I was confused because we are using older editions. She has a high average in Math 7/6. 1 Quote
Ellie Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 This is exactly what we did. My dd did the 3rd edition of 87 as a 7th grader and is now doing Alg. 1 in 8th, and is doing really well with it. I know the old recommendation was that Alg. 1/2 was stronger than 87. I believe that to be the case if using the 2nd edition books. But that in the 3rd edition, 87 is the stronger text, and you would use Alg. 1/2 on a slower track. It wasn't that Alg. 1/2 was *stronger;* it was that it taught things a little differently. I liked Math 87 better than 1/2. I still do. :-) 2 Quote
happypamama Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 DD skipped 87 and went straight from 76 to Algebra 1/2, where she found it to be very easy. Very little new information, and what was new was very intuitive because it was just a smidge different from what she already knew. We use older editions, though; I think our 1/2 is the second edition. 1 Quote
Mommy22alyns Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 I have not used Saxon all the way through, but I did do some research and talked to some other homeschoolers before deciding to put Rebecca in Algebra 1/2 after completing through CLE 600. She is doing well. 1 Quote
................... Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Unless your student is remedial, you should use Algebra 1/2. It moves them into the Logic Stage with plenty of word problems that actually require a small amount of thought and the book also has plenty of algebra and beginning geometry. It's much more interesting than 8/7 which is very much a drudgery. (I am not really a Saxon fan and would not recommend it after seeing the lack of conceptual solving my son had due to Saxon...but of the two books Algebra 1/2 is far superior and a lot more fun.) 2 Quote
PineFarmMom Posted January 22, 2016 Posted January 22, 2016 We just finished Singapore 6a and plan to do Saxon 8/7 then Algebra 1. I am hoping this is a good sequence because it is what I have been told by several people. We will use 3rd edition, and it was given to us, so that is a plus!! Quote
SparklyUnicorn Posted January 22, 2016 Posted January 22, 2016 I bought both. I ended up using Algebra 1/2. The 8/7 version is just too much. There are WAY too many problems and review. Quote
Mommy22alyns Posted January 23, 2016 Posted January 23, 2016 Unless your student is remedial, you should use Algebra 1/2. It moves them into the Logic Stage with plenty of word problems that actually require a small amount of thought and the book also has plenty of algebra and beginning geometry. It's much more interesting than 8/7 which is very much a drudgery. (I am not really a Saxon fan and would not recommend it after seeing the lack of conceptual solving my son had due to Saxon...but of the two books Algebra 1/2 is far superior and a lot more fun.) ^ You were one of the people I talked to that helped me choose Algebra 1/2! Quote
ZeldaRules Posted January 26, 2016 Posted January 26, 2016 My 6th grader is on Saxon 8/7. He has been missing too many questions in his math these past few weeks (really because of silly errors, he can do it) - so I slowed down to do a lesson over 2 days. One day he does the odd questions, the next, the even. My plan is to do Algebra 1/2 in 7th. We have used Saxon the whole way through. It's nice to know that 8/7 seems more like drudgery to others, because I feel the same. I'm taking things slower with my daughter in Saxon. She will be doing 7/6 or 6/5 in 6th grade. :) Vicki Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.