Jump to content

Menu

Most rigorous sciencs


Mama2two
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think if your 4th grader loves science you might want to feed that love. I would not be so worried about rigorous at this age but exposure. What does he love? What are his interest? If he love science why not do a year of interest led to really get his juices flowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be homeschooling my science-loving kid next year (1st grade) and my thought right now is to integrate science into his subjects as much as possible.

 

So for history, do this - Ancient Science: 40 Time-Traveling, World-Exploring, History-Making ... By Jim Wiese instead of doing coloring pages and the like.

 

With nature walks focus on biological/geological things, identifying the parts of seeds, or the type of rocks.

 

Have short "unit studies" on special science topics (like flight) ready to go for rainy days.

 

I am not a science person at all, so this will be really tough for me. But I'm hoping that it will help me answer all his "why?" questions and encourage his scientific mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BFSU is rigorous, but not intuitive for many of us. I love it and own it, but have a difficult time making it work. OTOH, it might be perfect for you.

 

It also depends on what kind of science he is interested in.

 

Something like Exploration Education might be good, but it is just physical science. TOPS science units are great but they are only hands on. However, I have hands on science kids so they like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ellen McHenry's curricula are accessible to a bright 4th grader and cover topics that I didn't see until H.S. or even college. They are very engaging as well.

 

A lot of people like Nebel's Building Foundations of Scientific Understanding (BFSU) but I personally prefer to follow the WTM 4 year science cycle rather than having all the different topics mixed into one book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think rigor is a difficult concept when it comes to the sciences, at least before high school. Rigor can have a relatively clear meaning for skills subjects like math and can even be pretty clear for geography or history. But for science, I think most people would agree that just memorizing more science facts like you might for history, can't be the complete picture of rigor. And really "doing" science will look different from one house to another. I think science is the subject that, again, at least before high school, is the hardest to box in and fit into a curriculum. I haven't seen any science curriculum for elementary school that I would consider rigorous. Some of them, such as Ellen McHenry, delve into the subjects a bit more. Some of them, such as BFSU, have a really good scope and sequence and ask good questions. But most of them, like Elemental and Mr. Q's elementary books, are light surveys at best. I think "rigorous" science takes a parent who's willing to think outside the curriculum and to get messy, take chances, and make mistakes... like Ms. Frizzle says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the funds I would get a microscope, slides, and many different science kits and let him explore. Library books can offer a wealth of information. If you want to go for a curriculum I might go for something from Ellen McHenry or CPO.

 

 

We have done that and we do the exploring already! I haven't looked at CPO science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to having completed algebra, the best science education is one that fosters a love of science and a curious nature.

 

Honestly, if a child loves science and wants a future science career, ensuring strong math skills is probably more important than any science studied in elementary school. Exposure to a broad range of science topics that piques their imagination and helps them think about the world around them is all they need in terms of "rigorous" science.

 

(Eta: just as a general pt of reference for those who might not understand why I stressed math skills, math drives science. A student with a love for science who possesses weak math skills will struggle in science courses.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to having completed algebra, the best science education is one that fosters a love of science and a curious nature.

 

Honestly, if a child loves science and wants a future science career, ensuring strong math skills is probably more important than any science studied in elementary school. Exposure to a broad range of science topics that piques their imagination and helps them think about the world around them is all they need in terms of "rigorous" science.

 

(Eta: just as a general pt of reference for those who might not understand why I stressed math skills, math drives science. A student with a love for science who possesses weak math skills will struggle in science courses.)

 

No, I will see if I can find them, thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think rigor is a difficult concept when it comes to the sciences, at least before high school. Rigor can have a relatively clear meaning for skills subjects like math and can even be pretty clear for geography or history. But for science, I think most people would agree that just memorizing more science facts like you might for history, can't be the complete picture of rigor. And really "doing" science will look different from one house to another. I think science is the subject that, again, at least before high school, is the hardest to box in and fit into a curriculum. I haven't seen any science curriculum for elementary school that I would consider rigorous. Some of them, such as Ellen McHenry, delve into the subjects a bit more. Some of them, such as BFSU, have a really good scope and sequence and ask good questions. But most of them, like Elemental and Mr. Q's elementary books, are light surveys at best. I think "rigorous" science takes a parent who's willing to think outside the curriculum and to get messy, take chances, and make mistakes... like Ms. Frizzle says.

 

 

Well said, I agree! I have been creating my own combining resources and adding to existing curriculum and would like to find something I could use on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...