MomatHWTK Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Someone asked the respondent for testimonials from a site other than his own, and as part of his reply, he posted the following. The bold sentence doesn't make sense to me. I left the other sentences to provide context: Isn't that a silly question? There are undoubtedly sites offering Neurofeedback (NFB) , and some may offer testimonials, but since Neurofeedback takes many half hour sessions at around $100-150 per session. Why? Neuroliminal Training (NT) has been proven to do the same brain wave changing as NFB at a small fraction of that cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindergretta Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 :confused: Uh, the second half of the sentence seems to be missing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellie Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 um...no... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Mungo Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 um...no... :iagree: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyhomemaker Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 um...no... :iagree: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momtoamiracle Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 it's missing part of it for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oak Knoll Mom Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Isn't that a silly question? There are undoubtedly sites offering Neurofeedback (NFB) , and some may offer testimonials, but since Neurofeedback takes many half hour sessions at around $100-150 per session. Why? Neuroliminal Training (NT) has been proven to do the same brain wave changing as NFB at a small fraction of that cost. I think the writer started to write one thing, then changed his mind and didn't go back and proofread. If you take out the "since" in the last part of the sentence, it makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindergretta Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 I think the writer started to write one thing, then changed his mind and didn't go back and proofread. If you take out the "since" in the last part of the sentence, it makes sense. I still think he needs to state why the sessions matter. There is only a partial thought there, not the whole thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catwoman Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Sounds like maybe the guy has had a little too much Neuroliminal Training, and his brain waves aren't working just right any more... :tongue_smilie: Must... Stop... Experimenting... On... Self... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindergretta Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Sounds like maybe the guy has had a little too much Neuroliminal Training, and his brain waves aren't working just right any more... :tongue_smilie: Must... Stop... Experimenting... On... Self... :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathryn Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-rap Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 No. It is a dependent clause, which is dependent on an independent clause, which isn't there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oak Knoll Mom Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 I still think he needs to state why the sessions matter. There is only a partial thought there, not the whole thought. It's hard to say since we don't know the question he is answering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.