Jump to content

Menu

the unscientific american watches a mammal walk into the water and grow fins.


Stellalarella

Recommended Posts

Thank you, thank you, thank you for these answers. They have been so interesting. I've always understood basic natural selection, but I've never understood why we haven't seemed to see evolution in our own time in larger animals. I remember the Darwin moth example from high school and I get bacteria changing. Do larger animals need more time to change, or has there been no impetus for them to change because the environment has been relatively stable for . . . many years?

 

Again, thank you so much for your answers. These have really helped to clarify my thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you, thank you, thank you for these answers. They have been so interesting. I've always understood basic natural selection, but I've never understood why we haven't seemed to see evolution in our own time in larger animals. I remember the Darwin moth example from high school and I get bacteria changing. Do larger animals need more time to change, or has there been no impetus for them to change because the environment has been relatively stable for . . . many years?

 

Again, thank you so much for your answers. These have really helped to clarify my thinking.

 

It takes larger animals longer to reach reproductive age. That's why we talk about generations in evolution and not years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do larger animals need more time to change, or has there been no impetus for them to change because the environment has been relatively stable for . . . many years?

 

It takes larger animals longer to reach reproductive age. That's why we talk about generations in evolution and not years.

 

For slow, gradual evolution to create a new species you need about 10,000 generations (obviously this is just a very round figure). This is A LOT of generations. With very strong selective pressures it would take many fewer generations, and you might even be able to get down to 500 generations. But with the 10-year generations of most larger animals, you are still looking at 5000 years.

 

The evolution of dog breeds is easy to see because it has happened within human written records. Dogs have evolved very quickly because of the very strong selection created by humans breeding the animals. And although dogs are considered a single species still, we are approaching the point where they soon will not be. I doubt very seriously that my younger sister's 8 pound female dog could effectively mate with my older sister's 250 pound male Mastiff. Not only do they have a problem with the machinery of mating :001_huh:, I think that the fetus would likely kill the tiny female dog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

What a great thread! I love it.

 

Have you all seen the HHMI Holiday Lectures on Evolution? http://www.hhmi.org/...tive/evolution/

 

Over the years we have enjoyed many HHMI Holiday Lectures (on DVD - they will send them all to you for free!) - now all streamable from the website.

Really interesting, in depth treatments of many science topics. Try hovering over the "Topics" tab and you will see a menu of all that is available. Each HL Series we have seen consists of 3 long "lecture" segments, animations, interviews with the presenters, Q&A with the attending students, and probably more that I am not remembering at the moment.

 

Good, good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

 

Also, no questions about societal issues: how evolution works in antibiotic resistant strains, the new flu vaccine every year, or genetically engineered organisms. And no questions about the implication of modern medicine in human evolution, the possible success of eugenics, or even the implication of small population size (bottlenecks) to the evolution of endangered species.

 

...

Ruth

 

 

A long these lines, what impact does global travel have on evolution. World travel has populations meet and breed that wouldn't have meet 1,000 years ago. What's the end result for evolution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because all groups of humans can mate and have viable and fertile offspring, humans are one species by definition. This means that there has always been enough migration to maintain a single gene pool. Even in the case of the lack of mixing between the old and new world for millennia, there was not enough time for random changes to accumulate and the environments were not different enough for natural selection to select for different traits, so there was no physiological problem to mating when the 2 groups re-met. Thus, the gene pools remixed very rapidly through mating.

 

There are obviously groups of humans who have a larger ratio of one allele over another, such as skin colour. With more migration (global travel), the differences between these groups will reduce as is already occurring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This was an incredible thread. I just finished reading it, added several books to my to-read list and need to mull all of this around in my mind.

 

I tried searching but couldn't find anything....have there been any similar threads (as in smart discussion) about the origins of life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a thread! I started reading and couldn't stop. Thank you, Lewelma, for making it so clear. Just from your beginning explanation, I could gather what you were saying. The rest was expanding the topic and icing on the cake for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my, 3 days later, my head is spinning I've learned so much. So glad to find this. I'm pretty sure Evolution got about 5 minutes in all of my high school education. Thanks! (Although I still don't think I understand it all.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

After this early 2012 discussion and tutoring session, I read The Beak of the Finch, Why Evolution Is True, The Violinist's Thumb, and Darwin's Black Box.  I was glad to gain an understanding of evolution, though it has also raised many questions for me, esp. in theological areas.  It's led me to teach my children differently (now choosing books, DVD material that support evolution) and I tell my kids as we've began studying the ancients again this year that we cannot ignore the fact that we have human-like fossil bones that speak to a much older history than I had previously accounted for.  As a Christian, I have to give pause and think about the Biblical Adam and Eve.  I don't have everything all sorted out yet.  I read Darwin's Black Box  third out of the four books I listed here.  It also raised questions for me that I don't find satisfactorily answered by evolution.  

 

In short, I am glad I started down a path of understanding on this issue and I continue to learn and ponder as I go on.  My kids benefit both from the new science training and also from watching me explore new subjects.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After this early 2012 discussion and tutoring session, I read The Beak of the Finch, Why Evolution Is True, The Violinist's Thumb, and Darwin's Black Box. I was glad to gain an understanding of evolution, though it has also raised many questions for me, esp. in theological areas. It's led me to teach my children differently (now choosing books, DVD material that support evolution) and I tell my kids as we've began studying the ancients again this year that we cannot ignore the fact that we have human-like fossil bones that speak to a much older history than I had previously accounted for. As a Christian, I have to give pause and think about the Biblical Adam and Eve. I don't have everything all sorted out yet. I read Darwin's Black Box third out of the four books I listed here. It also raised questions for me that I don't find satisfactorily answered by evolution.

 

In short, I am glad I started down a path of understanding on this issue and I continue to learn and ponder as I go on. My kids benefit both from the new science training and also from watching me explore new subjects.

I'm working my way through the book Redeeming Science by Poythress right now. Some of it deals with the creation/evolution debate but it is interesting to see his approach as a Christian and to see how much he loves science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...