Jump to content

Menu

Stumped with Math for Next Year


lemonade2122
 Share

Recommended Posts

Last year, we used MCP Math and my then 1st and 2nd graders hated it. Page after page of addition followed by page after page of subtraction, drove them nuts. So, for this year, we switched to Saxon. I have one in Saxon K, one in Saxon 2 and one in Saxon 3. But now, I'm the one having a hard time, for several reasons:

1. I feel very scattered with the incremental approach, especially since it seems too incremental at times. For example, my kindergartner just learned today how to tell time to the hour (Lesson 40-something). He LOVED learning this! The sad thing is that it's covered one more time two lessons from now and then there isn't another clock lesson for the rest of the book!

 

2. My kids have already mastered some of the topics being covered, but I'm afraid of missing something seemingly small that will then be needed later for a related topic. For example, I didn't see the point of learning to count by 7's (seemed totally random), so I skipped this. I then discovered that later they use counting by 7's as part of the intro into multiplication! So we started memorizing counting by 7's. It's just frustrating that there wasn't a clear explanation of why this was being done in the first place.

 

I looked at Rod & Staff's Math series and like how they cover one topic until it's done, while still including review, but I'm afraid of it being too much like MCP and the kids just ending up hating it. They haven't complained about Saxon (other than the lessons taking too long, which has led to us cutting out the daily "Meeting" portion)...do you think I should just continue with Saxon for next year or would a change be good even though it would mainly be for my own benefit??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're saying that you would prefer a mastery approach rather than spiral, you may want to look at MM. If you are saying you like spiral but just not the super-spiral-on-steroids of Saxon, then perhaps something like CLE (I know nothing of CLE but what I've read here). No need to be stumped; there are lots and lots of options ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, one of the positive things about R&S is the scripted oral classtime in the R&S teacher manuals. You spend maybe 10 or 15 minutes doing the lesson, which is where the actual teaching is, then you assign the seatwork...only as much as you think is necessary. You can add in the black line masters, which provides extra practice but in a different format from the daily seatwork (you photocopy the masters that you want to use).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're saying that you would prefer a mastery approach rather than spiral, you may want to look at MM. If you are saying you like spiral but just not the super-spiral-on-steroids of Saxon, then perhaps something like CLE.

 

 

:iagree: I would not be able to teach Saxon. Just the homework sheets in grade 1 drive me nuts. I wouldn't have any problem teaching CLE. If my child needed a appeal curriculum, that'd be my first choice. My oldest is a more mastery type guy, so MM and Singapore work for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...