Jump to content

Menu

Explaining WTM/Classical Education to a child/family


Bang!Zoom!
 Share

Recommended Posts

So now I'm getting questions about, "What's in that book you are carrying around?"

 

Um. "Oh, it's an educational theory called Classical Education."

 

"What's Classical Education?"

 

"Well, it's a really long story..."

 

lol

 

So, did you or have you ever tried to explain it? Do you kids understand what it means at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my kids haven't asked, but other family members/friends/acquaintances/school teachers (last year) have. Depending on their level of actual interest (you know how it can be, they ask without really knowing what it is they are asking) I try to explain a little.

That said, I did a HORRIBLE job of explaining it - to my son's 1st grade teacher, of all people!!! I stumbled over all sorts of words and just completely sounded like an idiot. We left and DH was like, well, you really convinced her... lol :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my kids don't know any different. They see me on the website, and they see the book, and they know we homeschool because I want them to have a better education. So when I am explaining a new concept or what we will be doing, I always tell my ODD that is what the book says to do. If it is in the book, she knows that is what we will be doing because we want a better education. :)

 

My mother is a PS teacher. She knows we follow a classical model, and she is intrigued. She thinks it is pretty cool. She especially likes the phonics and the SOTW, (the 4 yr Social Studies project as she calls it!) She likes the phonics because even though she was taught to teach whole language in college, as a special ed, remedial reading teacher, she uses phonics for her students. She is glad to see her district is going back to phonics for everyone this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my kids haven't asked, but other family members/friends/acquaintances/school teachers (last year) have. Depending on their level of actual interest (you know how it can be, they ask without really knowing what it is they are asking) I try to explain a little.

That said, I did a HORRIBLE job of explaining it - to my son's 1st grade teacher, of all people!!! I stumbled over all sorts of words and just completely sounded like an idiot. We left and DH was like, well, you really convinced her... lol :)

 

This is me totally, minus the teacher. But when I've tried to talk to family about it, I make it sound like I don't know what I'm talking about or that it is stupid, when I've actually given it hours and hours of thought and it is brilliant!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a long, in-depth discussion, I'm fine. A nutshell description is harder, although I'm getting better at it (after multiple less-than-eloquent tries!). The more I do it and internalize how it actually works, the easier it is to boil it down to the essentials. I usually explain it something like this:

 

A classical education divides a child's education into 3 stages: Grammar (early elem.), which focuses on building strong skills in reading, math, grammar, and spelling as well as filling a child's mind with lots of information (mostly in history and science) as a foundation for future learning; Logic (late elem./middle), which focuses on analyzing (asking "why" and "how"), building logical thinking skills, and organizing one's ideas so they can be clearly expressed; and Rhetoric, which focuses on learning to express one's ideas clearly and persuasively, both orally and in writing. The backbone/organizing element (at least in a WTM classical education) is history, which is taught chronologically, with the other humanities-type subjects (and possibly science) tied in to what is being studied in history. This facilitates a deeper understanding of how the world was/is, why it was/is that way, and enables students to make cross-discipline connections and more clearly see causes and effects. A classical education is very literature/language-centered (lots of reading and writing), and the rhetoric stage focuses on reading and interacting with the great works of western literature. And of course, a classical education includes studying Latin.

 

It's still a pretty big nutshell, but I don't really get to trot it out that often! :D And when I do, they generally ask about Latin, which completely derails the attempt to keep it to a nutshell! I also have difficulty not going into more details about a few things (like copywork/narration/dictation) that are fairly essential to the method. Most people who have been interested enough to ask are interested in the details, though, so it usually goes into a longer conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...