Jump to content

Menu

New edition Saxon vs. older editions - differences worth buying newer?


Recommended Posts

I posted over on the curriculum board but didn't receive any responses. Are the differences between old Saxon Algebra 1/2 & new edition substantial enough to justify purchasing a new one? Are concepts explained better/differently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the Algebra 1/2 texts, but for Algebra I and II, I would personally recommend the 3rd editions over the 2nd editions. The 3rd editions list the lesson number next to each of the daily 30 problems. This saves a lot of time in locating the lesson if review is needed. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, that's pretty much what the Art Reed book says. :D So, I guess if being able to quickly locate a particular lesson when doing problems isn't an issue, then the edition used is not a big deal. From what I understand that's about the only difference between 2nd and 3rd eds of Algebra 1/2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article was very helpful! Where does the new Geometry fall into the grand scheme of things?

 

 

According to the Saxon rep I saw at our convention the Geometry course was created for students who want a more indepth Geometry class or for use in States where schools require a seperate Geometry class. The courses Algebra 1, Algebra 2 and Advanced Math covers all the standard material in a High School program including Geometry. It is really similar to the way the Sequential or Integrated Math programs that are offered in many States/Districts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article was very helpful! Where does the new Geometry fall into the grand scheme of things?

 

Apparently it doesn't really. From the Art Reed site:

 

Several attendees asked whether or not they should use the new fourth editions of algebra one and algebra two textbooks as well as the new separate geometry textbook. I told the audience that the new fourth editions were initially created for the public school system together with the company’s creation of a new geometry textbook. I explained that the daily geometry review content as well as the individual geometry lessons had been gutted from the new fourth editions of algebra one and algebra two. In my professional opinion, they should stay with the current third editions of algebra one and two and not fall into the century old trap of using a separate geometry text in-between algebra one and two. (See the June - 2009 news article)

 

and:

 

Home school educators also asked about using the new fourth editions of algebra 1 and algebra 2 recently released by HMHCO (new Saxon owners) with their new geometry edition for homeschool use. To create the new fourth editions, all geometry was gutted from the previous third editions of both algebra 1 and algebra 2. Using the new fourth editions of their revised Saxon algebra 1 and algebra 2 now requires also purchasing their new Saxon geometry book to receive any credit for geometry. That makes sense, if you consider that publishers make more money from selling three books than they do from selling just two.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...