yvonne Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Do they cover the same material, just in a different way? R&S was recommended as a very solid grammar program in WTM, but SWB/JW must have written FLL to fill some niche that they perceived. Was FLL written to provide a secular alternative to R&S? We did R&S 3 last year & I plan to continue it. It's painless, but thorough. But.... being a curriculum junkie, I can't help wondering if there's anything in FLL 4 that I wouldn't get in R&S 4. Maybe I should use FLL to supplement anything I'm missing in R&S 4? I so do not need yet another LA curriculum. yvonne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mom-ninja. Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 :lurk5: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yvonne Posted July 12, 2009 Author Share Posted July 12, 2009 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.