Jump to content

Menu

Has anyone compared FLL 4 & R&S 4?


yvonne
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do they cover the same material, just in a different way? R&S was recommended as a very solid grammar program in WTM, but SWB/JW must have written FLL to fill some niche that they perceived. Was FLL written to provide a secular alternative to R&S?

 

We did R&S 3 last year & I plan to continue it. It's painless, but thorough. But.... being a curriculum junkie, I can't help wondering if there's anything in FLL 4 that I wouldn't get in R&S 4. Maybe I should use FLL to supplement anything I'm missing in R&S 4? I so do not need yet another LA curriculum.

 

yvonne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...