Jump to content

Menu

Life of Fred Advanced Algebra


Recommended Posts

Is it really enough? My dd loved the looks of this online, and is thrilled with it now that it's here, but is it truly a complete course?

 

I may be having trouble believing it is because it just isn't a typical textbook (but I guess that's the point of LoF). Part of me just wants to buy a used Lial's Intermediate Algebra, just to have something on hand that is typical.

 

Necessary, or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My ds is using it this year, and is also using Singapore's NAM in parallel. We have done this parallel thing for Algebra I, Geometry, and now Alg. II. I just finished writing tests last week. LOF is complete, but IMO it needs more practice/problem sets. That's one reason I add NAM. But as far as concepts, yes, it is complete.

 

Hope this helps,

Karen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In some classes, mainly math, what consists of a credit is mastering a certain skill and knowledge level. What are enough problems for one child are not enough problems for another. Nobody, except pedantic bureaucrats, cares whether you need 10 problems to learn how to use the quadratic formula or whether you needed 100. (that is ALgebra I but just an example). My youngest gets the point in math very quickly. My middle works through it and needs many more problems. As someone indicated the Companion text provides lots more problems, if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My ds is using it this year, and is also using Singapore's NAM in parallel. We have done this parallel thing for Algebra I, Geometry, and now Alg. II. I just finished writing tests last week. LOF is complete, but IMO it needs more practice/problem sets. That's one reason I add NAM. But as far as concepts, yes, it is complete.

 

Hi Karen,

I have NAM II and IIIA&B. The books didn't seem to cover Alg. II. Which book did you use parallel to LOF adv. Alg.?

 

Thanks so much,

Ruth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have NAM II and IIIA&B. The books didn't seem to cover Alg. II. Which book did you use parallel to LOF adv. Alg.?

 

You are looking at NEM, not NAM. There is NEM I-IV, which covers basically Algebra I and Geometry. NEM = New Elementary Math

 

Then there is an entirely separate book, NAM, only one book, which covers more advanced algebra concepts and some trig and a tidbit of calculus. NAM = New Additional Math

 

Confusing as all get-out, isn't it? :)

 

Edited to add: Ooops, I just got out the book and looked at it again. It's actually New Syllabus Additional Mathematics, so I guess I should be using the acronym NSAM instead of just NAM ... :/

 

Hope this helps,

Karen

Edited by kpupg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...