Jump to content

Menu

Esse Quam Videri

Members
  • Posts

    774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Esse Quam Videri

  1. We started our first class with TPS (Algebra 1) and I’m disappointed for a number of reasons. The classes are too long (90 mins/twice a week) and not much is covered, so it feels like a lot of wasted time. The teaching seems shallow. Perhaps it’s just the review but I don’t like the instructor’s explanations (encouraging simply using the algorithm instead of mentally doing it in steps, etc.). 

    Anyone have ideas on what we could do instead? I feel like I’ve explored every option and this was supposed to be *we finally found it*. 

    What we are looking for— a conceptual, engaging Algebra course that student can do independently, preferably with online teaching component where he can ask questions with an outside instructor rather than myself. I love math and can help but relationally he prefers me to not be the main teacher for math at this point. 

    I wish my son was open to AoPS, as my oldest daughter has thrived with it, but unfortunately he thinks he hates it. I’m at a loss to find a suitable replacement. 

  2. She actually tests quite high in vocabulary (likely because of all the great literature), but she does have an official 504 plan and all state tests are read aloud to her. She tests way above grade level in reading comprehension, too. The words she's not understanding in Barton are just not ones she hears-- midriff? Snippy? I don't think these will come up in a vocabulary program anyway :-). 

     

    Has anyone successfully used AAR with a severe dyslexic, after some initial work in Barton? Before, when we tried it and it moved too fast, it wasn't the phonograms that she struggled with, it was the word lists. She could successfully sound out words all day long... but that was just it. It never moved beyond sounding things out. So to work on a word list every lesson until it was "memorized" was not going to happen. It felt pointless to continue moving forward with the assumption that she'd "mastered" a set of words that she hadn't. BUT, perhaps now I could look at it really differently, and if she doesn't get the word lists just throw them out completely. 

     

    I have the advantage of a charter school that will provide any of the programs for me to try out... so I'm not down anything to explore another option. i DO want to use what is absolutely best for her in the long run, and if that's Barton, well okay. But I'm just curious to hear other voices and see if I haven't overlooked another option. It is helpful to hear from someone with a child with either severe or profound dyslexia, though, since I know it's uniquely challenging. 

    • Like 2
  3. We really liked the High Noon books we read—much less forced. But...it’s alao not practicing specific phonetic patterns so they were more relaxed.

     

     

    I love, love, love High Noon. I haven't used their entire program, just the books, but they are wonderful. Even using a limited set of words, they somehow manage to make the books interesting! I would bet that their full-on reading curriculum is excellent.

     

    http://www.highnoonbooks.com/index-hnb.tpl

     

     

    We're going to order these right away. Thanks ladies!

  4. You can look at samples for All About Reading and see what you think. They’re decodable, and some places are forced or have strange vocabulary words, but it’s the best I have seen for decodeable readers and a pretty thorough scope and sequence.

     

    There’s definitely nothing as bad as “fat midriff.â€

     

    We tried AAR early on, before we had an official diagnosis, and it moved WAY too fast for her. But perhaps now that she's worked through the early Barton levels, she could jump in easier? Anyone have experience with this?

  5. Ah, o.k.  I don't know if I can help but I will try.

     

    First, I have no idea if Barton is actually helping your child or not.  I can't seem to get a good feel for this.  It is not a good fit for everyone.  If it really isn't working, if he isn't making progress, then switching to something else may absolutely be a better option.  It depends on WHY it isn't working as to what might work better.

     

    Also, the program itself might still be a great program for your child with some tweaking but even if the program just needs tweaking, I have found from past experience with other material that sometimes there is too much water under the bridge and changes are implemented too late for a particular program to really work with a particular child.  They associate too many negative feelings with that program.  Also, if the parent hates the program, whether they intend it to or not, that view/attitude will bleed through and may negatively impact any forward progress the program may provide (BTDT).  Sometimes it just works better to change to something new.

     

    I will say that my own attitude definitely influenced how things went.  When I embraced the material and tweaked it to work better for me and my kids and tackled the process with enthusiasm it went more smoothly for all of us but that definitely worked better with DD than DS because DS had comorbid issues that just made the process a lot harder.  It was a lot more frustrating for him to get through the lessons, starting mid-level 3.  He struggled.  He hated that he struggled.  He still learned to read with this program, though. 

     

    Now I will share what worked for us.  Maybe some of this would help?  I have no idea if you have tried any of these things.  I will just toss out what seemed to help and hope that some of this might be useful.

     

    FWIW, DD had an abysmal attitude when we started (that definitely changed over time because she realized she was actually learning to read and spell but she started out being a pill to try and teach).  She didn't think anything could help her read and she was tired of trying.  Her attitude was awful and that was very discouraging for me.  It also made it harder for her to learn.  I second guessed what we were doing a LOT at first.  I had to accept that she had every right to be discouraged.  She had been banging her head against the reading/spelling wall for years.  I had to stop taking it personally and I had to accept that the process would not be easy for her, no matter what we used.  She needed some encouragement.  She also could not stay focused for long periods of time.  I eventually did a sort of reset.  We took a complete break for a bit then started over but I had to shift how we approached things. 

     

    1. First, I committed myself to a positive attitude.  I smiled.  I was sympathetic.  I was upbeat without being insultingly fake.  This was much easier once the kids and I genuinely started seeing progress (if there had been no progress we would not have stuck with the program) but I had to make myself improve my attitude first.  In other words, I had to shift from plug and chug, "lets march through this and just survive", to a more "this really is a great program if we will just trust it to do the job it was created to do and we can have some fun while we do it".
    2. I made the lessons part of our daily landscape, done at a consistent time when they were really awake, had had some physical activity, and I scheduled it right before break and snack time so they had something to look forward to.  I also never scheduled it after we had had to do something else requiring a lot of seat work and a lot of effort.  Their brains were too tired at that point.  I also never pushed it off until the last thing of the day because that meant we were all really tired but some kids do better if this is the last thing of the day because they know once it is done they are done with everything and can push through to get to the end.  I know that others have had success shifting when the lessons are done.
    3. I kept the lessons short.  Usually between 20-40 minutes.  But again we were doing them daily, M-F and sometimes short sessions on Saturday.  They became part of our landscape.  I got push back at first but it became just part of the routine.
    4. I created a quiet space that was only for Barton.  It was in a separate space in a quiet room.  There was a fun seat to sit on.  There was no clutter.  Just Barton.  It helped them both get into Barton mode and to stay focused.  Once we left the room, no more Barton for the day.
    5. I bought the Spelling Success card games and read through all the extra supports for tutors to find other games we could bring into the mix to keep the kids engaged.  This was a big help.
    6. I only used fluency drills upon occasion with DS and only a couple of times with DD since they did not actually improve fluency for DD (she didn't need them).
    7. I only used the Spelling tests upon occasion and I never drilled the spelling words.  I gave them the tests cold, frequently only using the short list.  Took very little time and was simply a tool to find out if they were truly internalizing the rules, not just sort of rote memorizing them.  DS liked seeing a big A on his tests so I sometimes did the spelling tests over word types already mastered so he could get a boost of confidence (and to confirm he still had those rules internalized).
    8. I stuck to only reviewing 3 sight words at a time, but rotated back in previously mastered words once in a while to keep them fresh.  I kept it short.  I did not drill and kill.
    9. The stories were only read during the lesson since they found them boring or odd at times.  When we weren't doing lessons they were free to pick up and silently read anything they wanted once we were halfway through level 3.  I worked hard to find books that were higher interest but had easier words to decode.  For instance, Lecka (poster here on LC) had pointed out that Divergent seemed to have easier words to decode.  She was right.  Therefore we gave DD Divergent for Christmas.  She was thrilled.  She read it cover to cover.  I did not assign it.  I did not ask her to read it out loud.  She simply took it out of the wrapping and quietly sat in a corner reading for fun.  She loved it. She had reached a point that she could decode enough words with fluency that she could understand the story and figure out the other words from context.
    10. I printed out ALL the extra practice pages (from the packet and from the website) and had those in non-glare plastic sleeves in a binder, along with the spelling lists.  If we were having a tough day or I thought we just needed some practice and not a full lesson I pulled out a dry erase marker, an extra practice page and a game and we also did hangman with a word or two from the spelling lists.  Great for reinforcement and could be fun.  Being in plastic sleeves, the Extra Practice pages could be reused for review.  I also created some of my own practice pages based on the format Barton used.
    11. I worked to incorporate some fun word games during the lesson (there are suggestions for how to do this somewhere in cyberspace but I don't remember where I found them).
    12. I let DD and DS play around with the words, creating new sentences, creating new stories, getting them more engaged with the material.
    13. I acknowledged that this process is hard.  It takes time. 
    14. I tried hard not to take long breaks from the program because it was really hard to get started again and it was really frustrating to have to go back and do a lot of review.
    15. I also acknowledged that while one size does not fit all and if something isn't working maybe it is time to jump ship, sometimes nothing will be easy and what I may need to do is at least try to adapt what I already have to work with the child in front of me. 
    16. I sometimes wondered if sticking with this program was the right thing to do.  I really did.  I also knew that we had hopped all over trying to find different ways to help and NONE of those things had worked well.  We were losing time and money and the kids were getting more and more demoralized.  Therefore, I also acknowledged that there might not be a truly amazing, easy to implement, super fun and engaging program my kids would jump for joy to do and that would actually help but this program had worked for a lot of people so maybe I needed to commit to trying to tweak what I already had instead of constantly mentally fighting with myself over whether to continue.  I shifted my focus, accepted that hopping around all over probably wouldn't net us much and I mentally committed to getting through at least Level 6 with as much enthusiasm and tweaking as needed to get us there. 
    17. I also shared with them that this IS a hard process and pointed out where there was significant improvement.  I celebrated their successes.  I did not make our mental focus about areas that still needed work.  In focusing on their progress I, too, realized that they had actually come a long way and it was working, albeit slowly at times.  We made progress in fits and starts and leaps forward and sometimes a few steps back.  But we were definitely making progress and acknowledging that fact helped all of us.
    18. I never required out loud reading outside of the Barton program until after Level 5.  If they voluntarily read out loud I did not correct or step in to read it for them unless they asked or seemed to want some help.  I waited patiently for them to finish reading and smiled.  If I constantly corrected them, it made them too self-conscious and insecure. 
    19. I realized that DD was struggling with comprehension beyond her issues with decoding/fluency and tried to work on that separately.  I tried not to confuse her ability to decode with fluency and her ability to comprehend as she read or someone read to her.
    20. But again, I was actually seeing progress with both children.  That helped me stay committed, even during the really hard lessons where I felt I was going to scream.  If there had been no or only a little bit of progress I would have quit after Level 3.  We would never have made it through Level 4.  Certainly would not have even attempted the higher levels we got through.  

    Not sure any of that will help you but I thought I should at least share, just in case.  Whatever you decide, whatever happens, I wish you and your son the best and hope you find a path that works.  Good luck and best wishes.

     

    I just want to say THANK YOU for this response. I am hoping to find an alternative to Barton, but there is so much wisdom here to glean from no matter what program we're using. And until we do find something else, I want to stay positive and enthusiastic, as difficult as it is. 

    • Like 2
  6. Well, I got on the forum to post but saw the "Throwing in the Barton Towel" thread first, which I can completely relate to. Friends, we literally hate this program. Every single sentence and story is so very contrived and ridiculous. Here are some recent examples:

     

    "When I put on my new silk dress, Jenny was a critic. She said, "The fabric is a bit shoddy. I expect it would be spiffy if you were not so skinny." 

     

    "Once, when Henry did a fancy step, he got a kink in his biceps. When the tempo got frantic, Henry got frisky." 

     

    "The snippy gals regret their gossip on campus about Patty and Tony." 

     

    Imagine this day after day for years... It literally breaks my heart! Throughout every lesson, my daughter asks, "What's 'iffy'? What does 'snippy' mean? What is a 'fat midriff'?" I can just see her mind shutting down more and more every day... it's like she's forming the mental habit, "I won't understand anything I read. Just decode and sound things out, even if they make no sense. Just disengage and go through the mechanics." 

     

    We follow CM educational practices, so everything else we do is LIVING, and I've seen that go so far for all of my children, including this one. Children learn with joy when their work is infused with ideas and meaning. This same daughter (9, severe dyslexic, working in Barton Level 4) is loving unabridged Pilgrim's Progress and Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew, for example. She listens and can narrate back with detail and passion. She has a wide variety of interests, loves to learn, and has an incredibly cooperative/positive attitude. 

     

    Is there another program that isn't so... dead? Is there anything that can compare to Barton sequentially, but that's actually written with quality of ideas in mind? I can hardly take it anymore. 

    • Like 2
  7. Well, we’re hitting some MAJOR walls in Singapore 3. Multi digit multiplication— she can do it with manipulatives but then she thinks she’s figuring out short cuts and throws zeros all over the place... Where would you go from here? My first thought was to scrap it and play multiplication games with c rods, which we’ve done for the last 2 months. We came back to the book and bam. Wall again. I know she’s really discouraged... she always thought math was “so easy†which has been such a gift to her confidence because she is SEVERELY dyslexic and struggling to push through Barton 4 right now. Help?

  8. She's 12, 7th grade and finishing up AoPS Pre-A. She LOVES it and does well, but this girl is also my liberal arts lover/reader/writer/painter/baker extraordinaire. She rides horses and spends lots of time collecting wild flowers and basically operates at a SLOW pace :-). She started Pre-A halfway through 6th and it'll be about 18 months from start to finish, but we did move cross country in the middle of that.

     

    So here's my dilemma-- she can work at a faster pace, yes, but I really don't want her devoting hours a day to math. Honestly one hour, five days a week, is all I want, for 8th at least. She's got so many other talents and gifts and I want her to continue to have time to pursue life in the fullest degree.

     

    But now I'm worried about not getting through enough math. She's definitely college bound and more than capable of getting through Calc at least (in a standard curriculum) and I'm really tempted to just give her something easier so it takes less time. But she is begging to continue AoPS. She really, really loves it. (Now, she may love something else too, since she's pretty easy going about school work.)

     

    Is it possible to make this work with AoPS? If we somehow complete Intro Algebra in a year, should we skip counting and probability and jump to Geometry for 9th, Int. Algebra for 10th, Pre Calc in 11, and Calc in 12? How much time would you say your student gave to AoPS if they completed this sequence?

     

    Or, should we jump to an easier curriculum and supplement with AoPS alcumus or problem solving books?

  9. Not answering your original question, but my son (who hates the physical part of writing and is not strong at typing yet) uses speech-to-text technology to "write" his assignments. He does have to go back in and edit, but it allows him to really tell his entire story, without getting stunted in word count because his hands are tired.

    • Like 1
  10. He's definitely a math brain but not ready for AOPS Pre-A, because he doesn't work independently yet and I don't have the time to hold his hand through it all. We've loved SM for him in part because he can keep moving forward conceptually without much work ethic  :lol: Should I just move into SM 6? Or does anyone have any fun suggestions? He's a little bored with math as it is, and I would love to liven things up. I do love teaching math and I'm wanting to explore some alongside him, but with an older sister in AOPS Intro to Algebra and a younger in RightStart D, I need something that is somewhat self-guided. What I really need is a program that will challenge him, hold his interest, and lead him in working more independently. And MM is out, because it's way too much writing/repetition for him. Help???

  11. Can I ask how you are handling grades/credits? We are in California as well. Do you file as a private school? If you come up with your own credits/grades for the math courses, do you other assessments to figure those? I guess I don't know if pushing for the online class where they may have to go faster and earn a B is a the best route, or if a better option would be to stick with AoPS on our own, go slower and "score" higher. Does AoPS have a typical grading scale, or is it similar to Singapore where different percentages match up to grades? We've never done any "grading" with it, but my Pre-A now has an 85% accuracy on Alcumus... Would she earn a standard B?

  12. We are looking at Pre-A 1 and Intro to Algebra 1 for spring semester. What have your kids enjoyed about the social aspect? If you aren't taking it for HS credit does that change the grading process? We had considered using Algebra for credit because our homeschool charter is being weird about it...

  13. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the intro games and play are mostly just to learn naturally the values, patterns, etc. and to form a positive association with using them :-). It certainly doesn't hurt to give some extra time just getting acquainted with them and making connections on her own.

     

    However, I'm not sure it's necessary. We never did the intro videos fully and have used the rods/videos successfully through lots of different topics.

  14. We consider formal grammar year after year a complete waste of precious time. We don't teach formal grammar until 7th grade. My 12 yo who has had little/no formal grammar recently went through some ACT test Prep and aced almost every grammar question... She's read LOTS of classic literature and picked up most of it naturally or through casual explanation. 

  15. I've purchased a few Boomerang and Arrow issues, and I especially like the hand holding for grammar/mechanics through copywork and dictation. I can easily find interesting passages, but my grammar/mechanics explanations aren't as clear and simple as those in Brave Writer. I would love a resource that lays out all of the grammar concepts, types of sentences to look for, how to teach the grammar concepts from those sentences, and a natural sequence in which to teach them. (For example, SEMICOLON SENTENCE-- this week look for a sentence with a semicolon. Explain to the student that each side of the semicolon must be an independent clause, able to stand on its own as a complete sentence. The two clauses are related and the semi colon takes the place of a coordinating conjunction). 

     

    I know WJ covers A LOT that we already know, but I'm willing to spend the $ if it has the above. 

     

    We don't follow the same format as WJ (reading one lit selection a month) as we follow Ambleside schedules. So while an arrow issue may have 4 dictation passages for a 20 chapter book, we would do 1-2 per chapter. That plus the cost makes Arrow/Boomerang a bad fit for us. 

  16. DD seems to be doing fine, and really enjoys it. Occasionally she has a question about a concept, and we go over it together, but she mostly plugs along by herself, including checking her own answers. She gets the majority of the problems correct, and she always gets really excited when she gets a challenge problem. She is using Alcumus, and she's at 85% accuracy there... is this enough? This is the first year that I'm really hand off with her because my younger students REALLY need my time. I'm slightly worried we will get through Pre-A and realize she really didn't understand some of it. Should I be checking in with her more somehow? 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...