Jump to content

What's with the ads?


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Danestress

  1. Even at 120 pounds, and using the calculator provided, if I have a drink with dinner, I have a BAC of .039. An hour after finishing the drink, my BAC would be .024. I drink a drink most evenings (and hardly ever go out at night). I would be well below the legal limit an hour after a drink, at .024. Being below the legal limit, though, doesn't mean one's reflexes/judgment etc aren't reduced. If there were any other issues (tired, eyes dried from wearing contacts all day) that would need to be considered. But I have driven an hour or so after one drink and think doing so is fine for me. However, if I had a drink and another drink an hour later, an hour after the second drink I would have a blood alcohol of .048. That is well below our legal limit, but I actually would not do that. Maybe it's because alcohol can make one sleepy, but I don't feel like driving for me would be safe enough to make that choice, legal or not.
  2. Well, I tend to think so much is sexual in a way that we are not even aware of. Or maybe "sexual" isn't the right word, but so much of what we do is about appearing a certain way, much of which is about being competent in a gender role and drawing the admiration of the opposite sex and, to some extent, the same sex. Men wear suits. Men might wear "power suits." Power ... money... these are about sex on some level, not exclusively, but partly. Men don't wear "muscle shirts" (or business suits) because they want to have sex that day with someone who sees them on the street. They are just living their lives. Women don't wear makeup or heels because they are on the prowl. I'm not talking about really high heels, which are and impediment, for most of us, to living daily lives. Some men dress in a way that shows off their biceps. I mean, sometimes those muscles are LITERALLY hanging out of a man's shirt so that everyone can see them. Muscles are about strength. Power. Very sexually appealing. They are also very useful and make one competent for tasks that are not about sex. Men show them off, boys want them and want to show them off. It's very cute. Women have breasts and hips (and also muscles, of course). Some women choose clothes that put their breasts on display. Breasts are very sexy. They are also pretty darn useful. If a girl pretends to have breasts or displays what she does have, it's not seen as cute at all. It's seen as slutty. Breasts identify a female as a female, much like muscles do for a man. But we are comfortable with a boy wanting to be muscle bound, masculine man. We are okay with a girl wanting to be a Mommy, but get uncomfortable if she wants to pretend to nurse. And we are not comfortable with her wanting to pretend to be women by stuffing her shirts or swinging her hips. But to me, at heart, boys and girls are doing the same thing - play acting with what feels very "adult" for their gender. And I think this says a lot about how we see women and how we see men. Much of what children and adults wear is very much the same. Both wear jeans, t-shirts, khakis, polos, sundresses, raincoats, etc. There are few clothes that adult men wear but boys don't. Even boys find themselves obliged to wear suits to weddings. Mostly the clothes I can think of that men wear but boys don't (except for play) are professional clothes - police uniforms, army fatigues, lab coats. And when I was a kid, boys spent a lot of time playing "Army" or "Police Officer." What do women wear that girls almost never wear except in play? Professional clothes as above, of course. Nursing bras and maternity clothes. Also heels, handbags, elegant dresses, makeup. II don't know many girls who want to feel adult by wearing nursing bras. I know lots that enjoy playing dress up with Mommy's heels and makeup. And they aren't thinking about how sexy they want to look. They want to feel how it feels to be a woman, and not in the aching breasts, tired feet, anxiety about bills kind of way. It would be nice if girls could associate being a woman with being brave, professional, strong, adventuresome. And I am sure most parents want to cultivate that in their girls. But it doesn't surprise me at all that girls might like bumping hips and trying on Mom's makeup and heels. And I don't see why adults can't look at that indulgently and recognize the sweetness and innocence of it.
  3. I do wonder why it's always cute when a boy wants to appear tough and macho - flexing his biceps or wearing sports gear, but when a girl wants to look like a grownup female - she is judged as looking sl@tty. Most adult women wear makeup. Why shouldn't a girl want to dress up look like a woman sometimes? Is there something wrong with wanting to look like a woman? More so than a boy wanting to look like a man? Is it only okay if the woman she wants to play act is a mommy with a baby? We have some unhealthy views of gender in our culture. But given those cultural images of what men are like and women are like, why is it so bad that a kid wants to play with those roles? I don't expect a seven year old girl to reject what she thinks would be fun about being a woman because it promoted sexism any more than I expect a boy to ponder whether the idea of biceps and competitiveness as defining masculinity is ultimately limiting for men. They are kids!
  4. Leather - or leatherette. Yes it is hot here in the summer. One can use a seat cover. It's is also muggy here, and it absolutely rains pollon. We are all about leaves, and that seems to make the world dusty. When I look at the layer of dust/pollon/God knows what that I wipe from my dashboard, I am not willing to have that in my cloth seats. I like being able to easily wipe it away. I also like the way leather/leatherette seats feel overall, though I agree they would feel gross on the back of sweaty skin.
  5. What I read here is 1. Other people want to say goodbye and 2. You wanted support When you are dying, your life can become a lot of 'goodbyes' and for some people, that is simply exhausting. If he wants to decide how to spend time remaining, he might realize that saying goodbye to old colleagues and friends is just not something he wants to expend limited time and energy on. I can see wanting to spend a lot of time with the few people I most love rather than with a list of people I care about but who are not my most primary beloved. I can see just wanting to be alone with my husband and children if I were dying, and I definitely would want time with my husband if he were dying. I would just want to shut the world out and be alone together. I did need support when my dad was dying - but I needed a couple of friends - not a group. Maybe they are the same way and don't realize you would find comfort in having more people to share it with. vut even if they do know that, I still think their desires are normal and take priority.
  6. Grades: depends on the kid, the goals, the price of college. Relationship with parent - mostly up to the kid. Routine hostility would make me question paying. But not communicating much, having some arguments and the like would not. Purposefully cutting us out completely would be a problem. Not really prioritizing us or enjoying us would not. Drugs and alcohol are to some extent the kid's business. Same with friends and church. But I am paying for four years. Getting arrested, dropping out, failing classes - these things can make college take longer and the kid will have to figure that out. I care about the relationship and won't use money to control my child. If behavior means failing grades, I will address the failing grades. However, I will not pay for a car for a kid who I have reason to believe is drinking and driving or using drug heavily, nor will I keep him on my insurance. Occasional marijuana use would not be enough. I don't approve, but my kids won't always do what I wish. I am less concerned about spending money on college than I am my personal liability for a kid I can't trust driving. That puts my home and my old age at risk.
  7. Perhaps not selfish. Perhaps it's just honest. I think it's also not selfish for a man to be honest and acknowledge that sex is a fundamental desire for him (if that is the case, and it isn't always). I am not sure how such a situation is can be well resolved. I don't think it's matter of who is right and who is wrong. Certainly there are those who simply can not have sex. Ever again. I know one couple who have apparently have found creative, sexually intimate solutions. I get the idea (without asking details) that this requires more energy than intercouse generally does (and energy is the major impediment to sex, which is why I mention that). There is a flat inability in that case, so no (I hope) resentment. I don't feel qualified to have opinions about what a couple should do when she is 'done' and not interested in pursuing all solutions, and he most decided isn't done. That is between the partners. But I have tremendous sympathy for the suffering of both.
  8. I think it's the other way, really. I think the message promoted is that women, especially older women, don't like sex. But I think we can all agree that there is a great range of "normal." I am an introvert too and absolutely feel no apologies for reading alone. I need a lot of alone. But when I read married Women talking about zero desire, and just flat giving up sex, i do wonder about whether a safe and effective way to Increase pleasure or desire would be a good thing. If my husband told me he had zero desire to talk to me and wanted to stop taking unless for an essential household management reason, I would not be happy. Even if that were in the range of normal, I would feel rejected and unfulfilled. And I consider my needs for taking and emotional intimacy to be low compared to other women. But I need some. If both partners are ok with no talk or no sex, great. If a person isn't in a marriage, great. No reason to work on intimacy (physical or emotional) if neither party cares or if a person is single. But for the rest of us, there is another person to care about. And since most of us are going to care and are going to have sex at least occasionally, one might as well pursue ways to enjoy/desire it more. For young mothers, often desire increases as exhaustion decreases, so getting alone time, help, sleep etc can improved the situation. But if the major factor is biological, and a simple safe product can help, I would try that.
  9. I agree. This is a depressing thread! I suspect I am older that a lot of you, and definitely not all about drinkng tea daily. But there are things in life that are (to me) about pleasure. Food. Wine. Sex. Poetry. Music. Conversation with a best friend, a difficult hike and the luxuriating in just being there ... a dog. Most of these things require energy and I don't do them on command. But if I stop enjoying them at all, I would want to work in 'fixng' that. I assume that pleasure is what you have left as an old person if you are lucky. I hope to at least enjoy my food and music when I am in my dotage, and if I still have a man, I greatly hope to still want him now and then.
  10. WARNING. FRANK DESCRIPTION BELOW (hopefully the young and/or sensitive to this have already gone elsewhere). I am not sure what you mean. In California, as I understand it, rape is based on sexual intercouse. Any penetration, even slight, with his penis would be rape. When I said 'complete the act" I meant any penetration with his penis. No ejaculation necessary. I assume the rape charge was dropped because the defendant was apprehended in the act, tackled and restrained, and there was no evidence his penis was ever involved. There was no physical evidence of penal contact (no semen) and he had his pants all zipped up, and no witnesses saw otherwise (victim can't remember). But he admitted to penetration with his finger, and under California law that is apparently charged as assault via penetration with a foreign object. Attempted rape, but not completed, because he never got the chance to penetrate with his penis.
  11. Not hard at all. If he didn't get to finish what he planned, attempted rape is the correct charge. Had it not been for the men on the bicycles, he may well have raped her. It's the same for murder. People are charged with murder only if the victim is dead. An unsuccessful murder is charged as 'attempted murder.'
  12. I like lobster but have not cooked it in my home. i think about that awesome Annie Hall scene.
  13. Of course. SKL asked about what to tell sons. I responded with what I have told my sons. Maybe it's not realistically what happens, but I think it's good advice. Have sex with people who want to have sex with you, and who are adult enough to acknowledge that by light of day.
  14. I didn't know much about this case until this thread. You made me look into it:). I did notice that the rape charges were actually dropped before trial, and the young man was tried (and convicted) of 2 assaults and attempted rape.
  15. I think these are reasonable questions. I tell my sons that if you like a woman enough to have sex with her, you tell her. Over lunch. In the light of day. And give her time to think about it and choose. But in this case, there was no question. The woman was completely unconscious when police arrived shortly after the assault was interrupted. That was around 1 a.m. she remained unconscious until after 4 a.m.
  16. The drinking and party happened at a frat house and the frat was serving alcohol to minors. So I guess that's why frats get mentioned. But wait? She wasn't a student at Stanford? Well, now I seriously don't care as much what happened.
  17. We insure against things we can not afford. I can afford funerals. I can not afford to support my family if DH dies. Not the way we live now. He can not afford to replace my (small) income and my (huge) unpaid contributions to our household. So yes, we have insurance on him, and a bit less on me. Privately purchased.
  18. I think there are two different things that need to be addressed: 1. Criminal responsibility. Rapists are responsible for rape. 2. Personal Safety: I think somehow people are afraid that if they tell their daughters some ways to protect themselves, they will either be sending the message that she is responsible if she is victimized or that they will be confining and limiting their daughters. I get it. I was resentful (still am) at advice that suggests I should deny myself adventure, solace, joy. I have traveled alone, camped alone, hiked alone. I like walking at night. I have done it in big town, small towns. Sure, that might increase risk, but to me, it's worth it. I can't eliminate all risk. If I take every possible precaution, I am not going to enjoy my life. But I am not afraid to tell my sons, "You are traveling to a place where people are poor,"(or crime is high, or there is little police protections) "Leave your jewelry at home. Don't flash your wad of cash. Keep your valuables close to your body." That doesn't mean they share responsibility legally if robbed. Thief is fully responsible. The victim is not to blame. I was pick pocketed out of a good deal of money once (on a subway, traveling). I did not take the precautions I should have. That didn't make me legally responsible for the crime. The thief was 100% legally responsible. However, it wasn't a great deal of comfort to know that. I wanted my money back! So yes, I did recognize my own mistakes (I knew better, I just got sloppy). But that had no significance legally. I don't think it is wrong to talk about the risks of heavy drinking at frat houses. I don't think it is wrong to talk about keeping watch so nothing is slipped in that drink. I think we can teach our kids about reducing the risks of being raped, robbed, assaulted, or scammed without implying that if those things happen, they are to blame. I think we have to talk very honestly with our sons too about reducing the risk of accusations by making sure a woman who seems willing is actually clear headed, willing, and not feeling pressured or under the influence. However, It seems like bad timing to discuss personal safety precautions after a terrible crime is committed. The instinct to want to lecture a victim on what she could have done to prevent it is appalling. I don't understand why anyone thinks a woman making a statement (whether to the court, her rapist, the police, her parents, or anyone else) SHOULD acknowledge ways she could have been more cautious. It's not her job to do that. Its not what she should be focused on in the aftermath of a horrible event. I don't understand why anyone reading this victim's statement thinks she owes us that, or why they think that if she doesn't share her regrets, she doesn't have them. It's none of our business what kinds of things she is thinking about or feelings, apart from those she chooses to share.
  19. Zoos have a responsibility to protect the animals they keep. If having a different type of enclosure would have protected the Gorilla from the harm caused by a child entering his enclosure, the zoo is probably wishing he had that enclosure. We don't need styrofoam boxes to protect ourselves from every little thing. But from the gorilla's point of view, this was a pretty big thing.
  20. My father told me never to make a big decision based only on money. There are other factors that drive our decision where to live. For DH and I, we can't put a price tag on living near our parents - we live less than two miles from each. I am happy to spend more for that privilege, especially as they age. I don't need world class arts, but I did want to live in a city where my sons could study music with first rate instructors and play in a good youth orchestra. I like taking my mother to the opera. I like good restaurants. I have lived in two towns that were low COL but ugly. I hated that. I don't need paradise, but I care about my surroundings. I am fond of lushness. I like living near an airport and close enough to the beach and mountains to easily go for a weekend. We live in an expensive part of our city. At times I regret that. We are paying too much mortgage and could have a better house if we lived outside the city. But we highly prioritized proximity. For years my husband had a five minute drive to work. He could come home for lunch with the kids. We spent a lot for that location, but those things matter to us MORE than material things.
  21. My son was 10 when my twins were born, and I could not agree more. He has been like a sheep dog .... watchful, protective, energetic, playful and adoring. He was the all time most vigilant safety officer. Now that they are older, he is a great friend to them.
  22. No one is without some bias. I don't think membership in a racial group itself is raises a sufficient appearance of impartiality to force a disqualification. I will be interested to see if any litigants (who we are not actually discussing specifically) file an actual motion to disqualify any (hypothetical) judges any time soon, and what grounds that motion might state. It's easy to spout off to the press. One might try to antagonize an inexperienced judge into commenting defensively and bolster one's case. But actually filing a motion takes a little more commitment.
  23. People get divorced. They split assets and debts either by agreement or a judge orders it. Sometimes all they have is debt. Sometimes the property division is equitable, sometimes one or the other maybe gets a better deal. They almost always both feel screwed. Maybe one is required to pay alimony. Generally the payer complains it is too much, and the recipient believes he or she got ripped off. Child support is support for the child - it's not a way to continue to pay alimony or split assts - at least it isn't supposed to be. Sometimes cooperative parties negotiate a way to balance these things in a way that they can agree, sometimes because their overall tax burden is reduced by increasing alimony, decreasing child support - or the other way around. But generally, it's child support - not spousal support. Child support is not meant to compensate women for lost social security benefits or the damage having babies did to their careers. Often being home more gives mothers a small advantage in custody decisions. You almost never hear them complain about that. If Scarlett's husband had paid whatever he is required pay by agreement or court order, he had no reason to feel bad about this. If the child wants to live with him, and the court modifies the custody arrangement and the support as well, he hasn't done anything wrong. One child aged out - not a surprise to Mom. The other wants to live with Dad and yes, she will have income reduced. But her water, grocery, and other expenses may also be reduced with a 15 year old living elsewhere.
  • Create New...