Jump to content

Menu

jplain

Members
  • Posts

    2,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jplain

  1. Yep, that's possible. Our home is 2000 square feet, everything electric, and our winter bills are ~$550 per month when the temps are in the 20's and 30's. It is still cheaper than using oil. ;) But we could probably do better if we replaced our refrigerator and our very old windows on the first floor.

     

    What have your outdoor temps been lately? And how high do you keep your thermostat?

  2. LOL. Yes, it is a joke.

    Here's the source: http://www.larknews.com/

    Wander around the other headlines and you'll get the idea. ;)

    And there's a disclaimer too:

     

    DISCLAIMER

     

    LarkNews® is a satirical newspaper published by Joel Kilpatrick.

    LarkNews uses invented names in all its stories, except in cases when public

    figures are being satirized. Any other use of real names is accidental and

    coincidental.

  3. Carolyn, I have been looking at the K-R pressure cookers but have been hesitant to purchase as they are so much more expensive. Can you tell me more about yours? Anything you don't like? Thanks!

     

    Hmmm...well sometimes it takes a long time to come up to pressure, but I think I have to blame my stove for that. ;) Other than that, there's nothing I don't like about it. The bottom thickness is great for avoiding scorched-on food. I have one called the Top Model, which has a turnable plastic top (link) instead of a stem. I ordered it online a couple of years ago, and didn't know I was getting that one instead of the regular one, but I'm very pleased with it. I like that the Top version has a couple of settings for releasing pressure, but it is a little more fussy to disassemble/clean/reassemble than the stem version. I also got a trivet and a plain glass lid (for non-pressure cooking) with it, and I use them both.

     

    I haven't used any other pressure cookers, so I can't say whether it is worth the extra $, but I don't regret having bought it.

     

    :) Carolyn

  4. I've compared these to the run-of-the-mill preschool/kindy workbooks, and I agree that they are much better.

     

    If not buying from Sonlight, you might want to consider getting these workbooks from Amazon: link. They qualify for the 4-for-3 promotion, so if you're buying all 4 it works out to ~$7.50 each including free Super Saver shipping. And of course if you don't want all of them you can mix and match with other 4-for-3 items: link to 4-for-3 Books Store.

     

    Edited to add: I'd suggest using colored pencils to complete the workbooks. On several pages it mentions using markers, but they bleed through too much, which is distracting when you get to the next page! Also, it helps to xerox the two instruction/answer pages at the back for easier reference.

     

    :) Carolyn

  5. Regarding the original post, I personally do not think it is okay to enroll a child as a K'er when s/he is so far from K eligible age.

     

    I know for the Six Flag, your child has to read for 6 hours in a certain time period- not including school stuff to be eligible.

    My DS is 5 1/2 and I had a hard time finding stuff he could read for 6 hours!

    Since there are only so many Level 1 Readers.

    I didn't feel right just letting him read BOB type books over and over, for six hours.

    Just to clarify this, for Six Flags a younger child does not have to do the reading themselves. A parent can read aloud to the child. From their FAQ:

     

    What type of reading counts?

    "Any recreational reading including newspapers, comic books, novels, and nonfiction. Kids can read on their own, or parents can read to younger students."

    (source)

  6. Yep, the deal through Homeschool Buyers Coop is the best I've seen.

    Their price is $30 for a lifetime subscription: link.

     

    Can anyone comment on how far the reading instruction goes? A comparison to ETC workbooks or Phonics Pathways would be the most relevant for our situation.

     

    Also, is there much reliance on sight words? I'm shying away from introducing too many, and in the sample it seemed as though they regularly introduce sight words.

  7. I have the last two Kindergarten editions. The 2008 one has an orange cover and the 2003 edition has a green cover. The 2008 edition is quite a bit longer, but it does not include reproducible gray block and lined pages you can xerox for additional practice. (I guess they want you to buy those now.)

     

    I prefer the 2003 edition in terms of instruction. The newer one dedicates a page to each letter, but at the same time it inexplicably leaves out the verbal cues for teaching each capital letter that were included in the 2003 edition. I also find the newer version to be somewhat unorganized and more visually chaotic than the 2003 edition.

     

    Neither has much instruction for left handed writing instruction. The 2003 edition has a single illustration showing how paper should be slanted for a lefty.

     

    The new one has 2 pages dedicated to lefties, but there's little text. It points out that lefties have a hard time seeing the left side of the page, so they may hook their left hands to see better. That can become a bad habit if not corrected. There are suggestions for how you might help to make it easier, such as xeroxing an extra copy to place on the right, or making your own worksheets which ask the student to write below the model or to the left of the model.

     

    There is one helpful tip regarding horizontal lines, like those in E, A, H, Ff, Tt, etc. They suggest that lefties be allowed to cross by pulling in to their hands if they prefer, rather than using the same direction righties use.

     

    HTH!

  8. The other resource I'd suggest is OOP, I think, but you should be able to find it used. It's called "Activities for the ALAbacus"-it's the original book written by Joan Cotter (RS Math author).

    Activities for the ALAbacus is still available: link.

     

    And for the RightStart card games, I believe it is cheaper to buy the Card Game Set rather than the book plus the decks: link.

     

    :) Carolyn

  9. Yep, just for fun here too.

     

    But DD did learn her short vowel sounds really well by listening to the short vowel songs. That was kind of nice, because sometimes I have to stop and search my brain to make sure I'm saying the correct vowel sound when I'm reading the syllables and nonsense words in Phonics Pathways. :D

  10. We've had the Leap Frog Letter Factory DVD out from Netflix for a while. I don't get the appeal, but my almost 3 year old seems to like it. Mind you, I don't think she's really learned anything from it, nor do I care. ;)

     

    Both my 5 year old and the almost 3 year old are really enjoying any and all Reading Rainbow DVDs I can find. Our discount store has been selling box sets ~ $10 for 8 episodes ~ so those have been a good value for us.

     

    Along the same lines, they've enjoyed the Scholastic Video adaptations of picture books. Last year we gave them a 16 DVD set when Amazon was selling it for 60% off. But I've seen lots of those DVDs at the library too.

     

    If you're looking for nature-type documentaries, Microcosmos, Genesis (not religious, just referring to beginnings), and Winged Migration are all fantastic and not inappropriate for younger kids.

     

    Good luck!

    :) Carolyn

  11. Yep, Lyme testing asap, because of the migrating pains and fever. I'd insist that they add other tick-borne pathogens as well, because some of the others have very similar symptoms. Contrary to popular belief, a bullseye rash is NOT required for Lyme disease, and in children the rash is very often absent.

     

    It can be hard to convince a doctor to do testing in an area not known for Lyme disease. But that doesn't mean people aren't acquiring it. It just means it isn't being diagnosed. :glare:

  12. It is good for practical jokes! I used to work in a lab and had ready access to dry ice. We'd put a small piece in a small plastic tube, cap it, and then casually walk by someone else's lab bench and drop it into their waste basket. A minute or two later the tube would explode as the dry ice melted and the gas expanded. Great fun! We'd do a similar thing in the lunch room. Drop the capped tube into an empty soda can, and then leave it on the lunch room table where others were eating.

     

    But that probably isn't the kind of thing you're looking for, right? :D

     

    We'd also put a piece inside a latex glove, tie the wrist shut, and then let it slowly expand into a big hand-shaped balloon. You could try the same thing with a balloon to demonstrate how the volume of the solid dry ice is much smaller than the volume of the "melted" CO2 gas.

     

    :) Carolyn

×
×
  • Create New...