Jump to content

Menu

dragon_horse_0002

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dragon_horse_0002

  1. Hi Kathy, Does it cover only single variable calculus or both single and multi-variables? Steward has so many versions for Calculus. Some have over 1300 pages and some less than 900 pages. I just wonder if one covers both single and multi-variables and the other covers only single? Modern calculus books nowadays are over 1000 pages. I tempt to agree that seems too much for me. For I believe math language is accurate and concise. Thanks, Liem
  2. Hi Kathy, Stewart has a couple of Calculus books (Calculus, Concepts and Contexts, Transcendental). Which one are you using for tutoring that you like? Thanks, Liem
  3. I know that Biology has been changed a lot. However, for teaching HS or 1st year college, do we need the most updated textbook? For what I know, one of the top HSs in Houston, Texas, they use 6th edition Biology by Campbell (Daddy campbell) for their AP Biology classes. If you don't mind getting the older editions, you can get 5th edition for Concepts and Connections by Campbell for $15 (we got ours in very good condition, no writing and high lights, no CD in 2009 for $10) or 6th edition for $30 from Amazon marketplace. Best regards, Liem
  4. Thank for your comments. You are right to say that telling Foerster is a drill type of math is a gross. We would like to clarify a little bit. Foerster is a very good book for Algebra. In fact we got it from recommendation of a trusted reviewer from Amazon, before we know and got the Dolciani one based on the reviews and recommendation of this forum. Between 2 books, we just like the way the Dolciani book is written and presented. It is concise but efficient as a good math book is written (for pure math). So we use it to learn the math concepts. The Foerster is also good . It also covers proofs and it has more problems for drills and word problems. But the way it presents the concepts is not quite concise as the way we like, So we use it for more extra exercises as drills. It is the same to Algebra of AoPS. It is vigorous and very challenging. However, the style of presenting the concepts IMHO, is not as concise to our like. It is just our preference. Best regards, Liem
  5. Dolciani has a Pre-Algebra (60s-70s) and Structure and Method 8 that cover Pre-Algebra material. The Structure and Methods 8 covers more than the PreAlgrbra book. Liem
  6. We have Foerster, Dolciani (1965), and Intro of Algebra of AoPS. So far, we have used only 2 books: Foerster and Dolciani. We find Foester is more for drills and application math. Dolciani is about right. It does not have a lot of drills as Foerster, but it is concise and balance between drill (A type), word problems (B type) and some times get the kids get a touch of pure math (proofs) (type C). We have not spent time for AoPS yet. We hope some moms here can give us more insights to the book. From what we scan through, the presentation is not as concise, easy to read as Dolciani, but the problems are more interesting and more puzzled than Dolciani. So now we mainly use Dolciani for learning the math concepts, for it is concise and clear (as written in pure math books). We use Foerster for extra drills. We plan to go back AoPS on-line class, after we cover most of the important math concepts in Dolciani. We love to hear comments and suggestions. Liem
  7. As I understand, Campbell has "Biology: Exploring Life". It is for high school. The Campbell Concepts and Connections are for non-major college level. Campbell Biology is for bio major. So I think Biology Exploring Life is a good introduction to biology and a good stepping stone for Concept and Connections/or Biology (Daddy Campbell). The order of the chapters of the 3 books are similar, but the depth of the material are different.
  8. From what I learn from this site (from Jane NC, Kathy Richmon, Blue Hen ...), if you kids love math and you and your kids have time, here is what I would like to do: -Dolciani for Math concepts. The great thing of Dolciani is that it comes to the point. It is very concise and it has problems that build a great Math foundation/proof skill (esp problems belong to category C). -AofPS is for more challenging and difficult problems. If you want easier or application problems, Foerster is good. -Gelfand's books are good supplements too. Liem
  9. Hi Jane, Thank you very much for the info. I have Dolciani Modern Algebra (I don't have the 60s edition, but the 1975). I will check it out. Really appreciate your help. Liem
  10. Hi Jane, Would you please let me know what is the good book to study operations of irrational numbers like squareroot(a*b) = squareroot(a) * squareroot(b). I think it belongs to pre-algebra, but I can't find the topic in 5th grade Math or Singapore. Thanks, Liem
  11. Are the online quizzes much diffrerent than the questions at the end of each chapters? How do you like the Exploring Life? What grade do you use it? BTW, sometimes you can find TE of the textbook on Amazon and Ebay.
  12. Which text do you think is better: Conceptual Chemistry and Spectrum Chemistry? Have you had a chance to compare either of them to Introduction to Chemistry by Zumdalh? Thanks, dragon_horse
  13. I am surprised to hear that. I know that kids that cannot get directly into UT Austin from HS, have to go to UT SA to get good GPA to transfer back UT Austin. UT Austin and A&M used to be ranked top twenty in Engineering schools. You are right about deregulation of public college/university tuition, which occurred a few years ago. Average expense (Texas residents) in Texas universities is 20K/year nowadays. For out-of-state, it must be higher.
  14. Ditto to Rice in Houston. It is one the best deals in the nation for a private school. I heard good things from Trinity in San Antonio. If you want to stay in Texas, go to engineering fields, and do not mind of public schools and crowded schools, UT Austin or A&M are good choices.
  15. Thank you Kathy for all the information about AP Physics. It is invaluable to me. I do some more search of Physics Resnick, Halliday & Krane. Here is what I found from Amazon: -The 4th Ed Volume 2 Extended (ISBN-13: 978-0471548041) has 688 pages, the same number of pages the 5th Ed Volume2, but different publsihers and 10 years between 2 editions. I don't know how much difference in the contents of the 2 editions, but the price of the 4th is basically your shipping. -The 4th Ed Volume1 (ISBN-13: 978-0471804581) has 656 pages, in compare the 624 pages in the 5th Ed. The 3rd edition is a different story. They are only 400 pages for each volume. So I think the 4th Ed is much closer to the 5th Ed. For the price, I went head and ordered the 4th Ed for now. I will know more when I receive the books. All the info that I quote is here based on Amazon info (sometimes they are not quite accurate). Hope it help for people who are in buget and who need the books for reference. Best regards, dragon_horse
  16. Hi Kathy, I found in Amazon only Volume2 Physics Resnick, Halliday & Krane; 5th Edition. I don't see the Volume1 anywhere. Do you have the ISBN of both? Did your kids take any Physics before Giancoli (then Halliday)? Greatly appreciated for your sharing syllabus. Liem
  17. Thank you very much for everybody's help about Exploring Life TE. BTW, Has anyone compared the following. -Exploring Life by Campbell and Miller and Levine's Biology text from Prentice Hall. I found the latter is used at 9th grade in some top AP program in our school district. -Biology by Campbell or Concepts & Connection by Campbell with Life: The Science of Biology by David Sadava. Some of my friends say that latter one (Life) is better written and easier to understand than the Big Daddy Campbell. I wonder Life is for non-biology major (but university level) as Concepts & Connections. Life is used by MIT? Thanks, dragon_horse
  18. I try to find the Exploring Life Teacher Edition. Is it ISBN ISBN: 0130625930 ISBN-13: 9780130625939? From the information from Amazon, it looks like it is a much smaller book for it is only 1.7 pounds, in compare to the textbook that is almost 5 pounds. Besides, Campbell is not in the names of the authors of TE book. Is it the same TE book that you find helpful. Thanks, dragon_horse.
  19. What book do you plan to use for Calculus of a Single Variable for a mathy one?
  20. The 1963 one is Modern Algebra and Trigonometry Structure and Method of Modern Math Series. Authors are Dolciani, Berman, and Wooton. The back has only answers of the odd problems. The 1980 Revised Edition is Algebra2 and Trigonometry. It is revised from the 1974, 1978 edition of Houghton Mifflin. Authors are Dolciani, Beckenback, Sharron, and Wooton. ISBN 0395279267. The back has the answers of all problems. Here is some opinions from what I scan thru the 2 books. If you are math majors, you would like the 1963 better. For reading the 1963, I feel like I read beginning chapters of math major textbooks (the language and the presentation). The language in 1980 is more "relax". feel it is more a textbook for students in junior and highschools. May be that is the reason why some think the newer Dolciani are not "rigorous" as the older ones. I think both are good. The 1963, IMO, is more for mature kids. For less mature kids, the 1980 may be better. Hope it help.
  21. I got Algebra and Trig II 1963 and revised edition 1980. They are almost the same. They start with anxioms of addition and multiplication in R, and then make proofs from those axioms. I like the revised edition better, for the exercises are more interesting. I think the new one covers more material. One of the coauthors of the revised edition is Eckenback. Hope it help.
  22. What website is that I can read the full text of Euclid online? I think Gelfand is more difficult than normal Algebra textbooks. It is a good supllement, but does not cover enough all topics for the textbook. I think the Gelfand's is more difficult than Introduction of Algebra of AOPS. Thank for your reply.
  23. What Eulid book is it? How is it compared to Kiselev's Geometry?How much do you like Zome:Geometry? What are the strong points of each book? What grade do you start your kid with Gelfand's Algebra? To me, it is a great supplement, but I dont know when is the good time to introduce it to my ds.
  24. Both solutions from elegantlion and Tcoppod involve algebra, I think. They construct 2 equations and 2 unknowns. For 3rd grade level, I think nmoira's is the right way to solve the problem. I think the challenge of problems like this is how to solve it with the 3rd grade knowledge.
×
×
  • Create New...