I have done a lot of research about CC as I am going to help start up and direct a Foundations/Essentials this coming fall.
In the paperwork they make the director agree that she understands that Classical Conversations belongs to Leigh Bortins. It is her reputation on the line with Classical Conversations groups. I believe that is why they are careful about what they teach and not deviating from it. So many people have so many different ideas. She has to somehow have quality control on her organization. She is well within her right to do so and we are free to not participate. I understand that one reason people homeschool is freedom. That will always be part of a tension with any kind of community/co-op. People need to understand that going into any group.
Secondly, concerning the cost. I now belong to a co-op group with volunteers for everything. It is a mish-mash of whatever anyone is willing to teach and sometimes no one is willing to teach anything. Other times the same mom is constantly offering classes and everyone comes but doesn't serve. Also, it is not classical or even close to classical.
CC is a great model to me personally. The worker is worth her hire. If a mom is willing to teach 3 hours a week, go to practicums, and prepare weekly, then a small stipend is reasonable and logical. The director does a lot of preparation and deals with a lot of stress. It isn't a money making scheme. It's a way for everyone to contribute and benefit fairly. It's a way for moms who can't afford it to pay some of the costs through tutoring.
My purpose was just to defend some of CC practices. I don't think it is for everyone. They even say that in informational meetings. But I felt like there was a little bit of an indignant tone about curriculum/cost that could be addressed.:)