Jump to content

Menu

Help with an AoPS Geometry problem


Recommended Posts

I think I am missing something.  I have the solution manual but I cannot understand part of the rationalization for the approach.

 

This is exercise 6.3.6 dealing with Pythagorean triples.

 

After setting up the problem we are to solve for a and b in the equation:

 

a^2 + b^2 = (97)^2

 

This is rearranged to:

 

a^2 = (97+b)(97-b)

 

where we are to use trail and error to find b so that the right hand side of the equation results in a perfect square.

 

The solution manual says that (97+b) and (97-b) must each (on their own) be perfect squares and that is key to solving the problem.  Why is this true and where does that "rule" come from?

 

I have reworked the problem and numbers using a simple 3-4-5 triple where I do not find this to be true:

 

a^2 = (5+b)(5-b) 

 

If a=4 and b=3, the equation is satisfied and does result in a triple but both (5+b) and (5-b) are NOT perfect squares so I cannot figure out how we were to come to the conclusion that this must be true in order to solve for 6.3.6.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have reworked the problem and numbers using a simple 3-4-5 triple where I do not find this to be true:

 

a^2 = (5+b)(5-b) 

 

If a=4 and b=3, the equation is satisfied and does result in a triple but both (5+b) and (5-b) are NOT perfect squares so I cannot figure out how we were to come to the conclusion that this must be true in order to solve for 6.3.6.

 

I can't speak to this exactly, but if b=4, then (5+b) and (5-b) are both perfect squares.

 

Which makes me wonder if a has to be assigned to the shortest side? 

 

5-12-13

a=5, b=12, c=13

a^2 = (13+b) (13-b) --> works

 

if a=12, b=5, c=13

a^2 = (13+b) (13-b)  --> doesn't work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

…

 

I have reworked the problem and numbers using a simple 3-4-5 triple where I do not find this to be true:

 

a^2 = (5+b)(5-b) 

 

If a=4 and b=3, the equation is satisfied and does result in a triple but both (5+b) and (5-b) are NOT perfect squares so I cannot figure out how we were to come to the conclusion that this must be true in order to solve for 6.3.6.

 

but if you let a=3 and b=4, it does work.

 

a^2 = (5+b)(5-b) 

3^2 = (5+4)(5-4) 

9=(9)(1)

9=9

 

(65, 72, 97)

65^2 = (97+72)(97-72)

4225=(169)(25)

4225=4225

 

It looks like a has to be the smallest number and c has to be the largest number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is rearranged to:

 

a^2 = (97+b)(97-b)

 

where we are to use trail and error to find b so that the right hand side of the equation results in a perfect square.

 

The solution manual says that (97+b) and (97-b) must each (on their own) be perfect squares and that is key to solving the problem.  Why is this true and where does that "rule" come from?

 

  I don't think the solutions manual says that 97 + b and 97 - b must each be perfect squares.  My copy of the manual says: "Since (97 - b)(97 + b) must be a perfect square, we try to find values of b that make both 97 - b and 97 + b perfect squares."  In other words, it's merely saying that if 97 - b and 97 + b are perfect squares, then their product (97 - b)(97 + b) is a perfect square.  And fortunately, we can find b such that 97 - b and 97 + b are squares.

 

 

Edited by Ravi B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  I don't think the solutions manual says that 97 + b and 97 - b must each be perfect squares.  My copy of the manual says: "Since (97 - b)(97 + b) must be a perfect square, we try to find values of b that make both 97 - b and 97 + b perfect squares."  In other words, it's merely saying that if 97 - b and 97 + b are perfect squares, then their product (97 - b)(97 + b) is a perfect square.  And fortunately, we can find b such that 97 - b and 97 + b are squares.

 

 

 

Ah.  So they don't both have to be perfect squares on their own but by looking for perfect squares we can be assured their product will be a perfect square.  That makes sense.  Thanks!  However, they is no way my 14yo was going to figure that one out on her own.  Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it's a challenging problem, which is why it's starred and has a hint at the back of the textbook.  If you or your 14 yo is interested in further properties of Pythagorean triples, check out Euclid's formula on the Wikipedia page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_triple

For example, we can use Euclid's formula to solve the problem you posed here (find a Pythagorean triple with hypotenuse 97).  Using Euclid's formula, we just need a way to express 97 (not 97^2) as a sum of two squares, which is easy (9^2 + 4^2).  Once we do that, we can determine the two legs: 9^2 - 4^2 = 65 and 2*9*4 = 72.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...