AllSmiles Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 I have a word problem that has me stumped. I'm having trouble even understanding the question. I'm sure I'm just missing something easy, but I was hoping someone could help. This problem needs to be solved using only one variable. Leslie has 20 quarters and dimes. If she had as many dimes as she has quarters and as many quarters as dimes, she would have 30 cents less. How many of each coin does she have. The answer: 11 quarters and 9 dimes Thanks for you help! AllSmiles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regentrude Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 (edited) Q= current number of quarters D= current number of dimes Q+D=20 Amount of money she has: 0.25*Q+0.10*D Problem states: if she had Q dimes and D quarters instead, she'd have $0.30 less. So: 0.10*Q +0.25*D= (0.25*Q+0.10*D) - 0.30 Solve the system of equations for Q and D. Edited February 20, 2017 by regentrude 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllSmiles Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share Posted February 20, 2017 Regentrude, Thanks for the help. I can follow the reasoning of the solution you gave. Unfortunely, the problem can only be solved using one variable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regentrude Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Regentrude, Thanks for the help. I can follow the reasoning of the solution you gave. Unfortunely, the problem can only be solved using one variable. The bolded makes no sense since there are TWO variables: Q and D. The two variables are related by the statement that you have 20 coins in total. Thus, Q+D=20. Which lets you express one variable through the other, for example Q=20-D, and thus express the remaining equation in terms of only one variable. As is ALWAYS the case when you have a system of two linear equations with two variables. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathy in Richmond Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Try thinking this way: Basically what Leslie did was to swap each quarter for a dime, and each dime for a quarter. She gains 15 cents every time she swaps a dime for a quarter, and she loses 15 cents every time she swaps a quarter for a dime. Since she lost a total of 30 cents, she must have done 2 more "quarter->dime swaps" than she die "dime-> quarter" swaps. In other words she started with 2 more quarters than dimes. We can model it like this: (x= number of dimes at beginning) |----------x------------|-2-| quarters |----------x------------| dimes So x + 2 + x = 20 total coins 2x + 2 = 20 2x = 18 x= 9 dimes x+2 = 11 quarters 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noreen Claire Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 now: no. of quarters: Q no. of dimes: 20-Q amount of money she has: .25(Q) + .10(20-Q) switch Qs and Ds: no. of quarters: (20-Q) no. of dimes: Q amount of money she has: .25(20-Q) + .10(Q) - .30 set both scenarios equal and solve: .25(Q) + .10(20-Q) = .25(20-Q) + .10(Q) - .30 . . if Q=9 and D=11, then total=$3.35 if Q=11 and D=9, then total=$3.65 (Last line reads "if she switched...sje would have less", so answer is 11 quarters and 9 dimes.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noreen Claire Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Try thinking this way: Basically what Leslie did was to swap each quarter for a dime, and each dime for a quarter. She gains 15 cents every time she swaps a dime for a quarter, and she loses 15 cents every time she swaps a quarter for a dime. Since she lost a total of 30 cents, she must have done 2 more "quarter->dime swaps" than she die "dime-> quarter" swaps. In other words she started with 2 more quarters than dimes. We can model it like this: (x= number of dimes at beginning) |----------x------------|-2-| quarters |----------x------------| dimes So x + 2 + x = 20 total coins 2x + 2 = 20 2x = 18 x= 9 dimes x+2 = 11 quarters Very elegant! Nice! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllSmiles Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share Posted February 20, 2017 (edited) Thanks for all the help! It was nice to see the explations. I think I have a handle on the problem now. Thanks, AllSmiles Edited February 20, 2017 by AllSmiles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.