Jump to content

Menu

Pew Research re: BLM


MomatHWTK
 Share

Recommended Posts

About a third of Americans familiar with Black Lives Matter say they don’t understand the goals of the movement.

 

I follow current events and have seen conflicting information about the goals of BLM. Is it focused on reforming the police & criminal justice system or is it a more broad attempt to improve the status of African-Americans? Part of the problem seems to be that compared to the 1950's and 1960's era civil rights movement, BLM is a lot less organized and doesn't have the same kind of leaders that the media can talk to. If you asked the average white American during the mid-20th century civil rights era to name a leader, most probably could've named MLK Jr. or John Lewis or Rosa Parks, etc. If you asked the average white American today to name any individual associated with BLM, I don't think very many could come up with a name. I can think of some celebrities who support BLM but that's not the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I was trying to figure out from the title why we would be discussing pew research about the Bureau of Land Management.

 

Acronym confusion FTW.

Not just you - Bureau of Land Management was the only thing that came to mind for me too.

 

For the record, I rarely click on links here due to having a couple route to spam-heavy sites. I

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, the research says (to me) that this is a black organization with black support. The majority of those who understand their goals and believe it will be effective are black individuals.

 

If their goal is to affect change among the black community, then this would be fine. However, if their goal is to make changes for the black community within the US, they are really fighting an uphill battle.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, it would be good to see a follow up for the past few months. It came across my twitter feed today. Perhaps, it is being retweeted due to the current situation.

 

It appears that this report relied on several months of research- so I guess it would take some time to do another. Perhaps another agency will do so.

 

What I see is substantial support from both blacks and Hispanics. It also appears that those who don't support cite a lack of understanding. To me, this indicates a communication problem not a fundamental disagreement on principal. Communication issues can be overcome. (Or one would hope.)

 

So, there, now I have expressed an opinion. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested to see how quickly the numbers may have changed over the summer, with the more recent deaths, the shooting in Dallas, the riots, etc. A lot has happened for the movement since February when they began collecting data.

Not to be a pessimist, but I doubt they have changed much. People are pretty set in their ways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mind has been changed significantly since January. I tend to process based on data and facts. Recent facts have definitely changed my views. Also on my Twitter feed today was a MLK quote "We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools."

 

If nothing else, the Tweets I'm seeing are reflective of what professionals in digital media are sharing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be a pessimist, but I doubt they have changed much. People are pretty set in their ways.

 

I disagree. After the murders of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge, I saw a major softening of support for BLM among people I know. A number of folks went from being totally supportive to having mixed feelings or from having mixed feelings to unsupportive. It was reminiscent of how 9/11 impacted the perception of Palestinians. There was a lot more sympathy to the cause before it became associated with condoning terrorist acts.

 

Edited by Crimson Wife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something here? This response seems way out of place. 

 

Most of the time when someone shares something like this they comment on it. They might state their opinion or just ask others for theirs. This was just a link with nothing else. I know the poster is a regular here so I know it wasn't spam or trolling. Therefore I asked what her reason for sharing is. Does she want to discuss it? Ask us what we think? Is it meant to say something about how she feels? If it's meant to discuss BLM, well the link just tells what Americans think of BLM, not what BLM is. Is the OP pointing out that most Americans don't know or understand much about it? If so, for what purpose? Does she want to educate others or ask for opinions?

 

I don't think it's out of place to ask about a link that's been shared with no comment and no clear purpose, especially when the subject is known to be controversial.

Edited by Lady Florida.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um... I just shared the research. How on earth do you get 'trying to make a point' from sharing research? 

 

If you're referring to my post, I didn't say you were trying to make a point, I asked what you were trying to point out. The two are not the same. I wanted to know your reason for sharing the link, since you didn't say anything in your OP. It was a sincere question.

Edited by Lady Florida.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...