Jump to content

Menu

Brave ex police officer speaks out against parent's getting the blame for vaccine damages


Jasperstone
 Share

Recommended Posts

This brave Australian police office is so worth listening to! It's an awesome, powerful 10 min presentation about parents being charged with shaken baby syndrome, when it's the vaccines causing the brain swelling!!!

 

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnVkJmoXDqc

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, my husband was damaged by the Hep. B shot, as well. He has Lupus now thanks to it. That's why I'm passionate about showing the other side to vaccines.

Can I genuinely ask, how they know the lupus was caused by the shot? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I genuinely ask, how they know the lupus was caused by the shot?

Because straight afterwards of getting the shot, he got sick. He went from healthy, and holding down 3 jobs to not being able to do that anymore.

 

There is a link between the two. Of course they (pharmaceutical industry) deny it.

 

I'm just sharing......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because straight afterwards of getting the shot, he got sick. He went from healthy, and holding down 3 jobs to not being able to do that anymore.

 

There is a link between the two. Of course they (pharmaceutical industry) deny it.

 

I'm just sharing......

Um, most people come down with Lupus in the same manner.

 

And regarding the link, I know when I want accurate scientific information the first thing I look for is a cop on YouTube.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll admit I just skimmed the links but I don't see any admission from the FDA???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Links to actual studies are preferable to sites that make statement such as, "Drug industry is like organised crime..."

 

Here's a link to an actual study and a copy and paste of the last sentence. 

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17576737

 

"Hepatitis B vaccination was safe in inactive SLE patients with an adequate vaccine response rate."

 

I am truly sorry about your husband, but there is no actual evidence other than correlation, that the vaccine caused his condition.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because straight afterwards of getting the shot, he got sick. He went from healthy, and holding down 3 jobs to not being able to do that anymore.

 

There is a link between the two. Of course they (pharmaceutical industry) deny it.

 

I'm just sharing......

I'm so sorry to hear about your husband. :(

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't watch the video because I'm visiting family and I'd wake everyone up, but how does this cop know the children have vaccine injuries as opposed to having been shaken?

 

He started seeing a link between recently vaccinated babies, and them hemorrhaging soon afterwards. He was required to investigate those situations, and saw a common denominator etc...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.woodmed.com/index.php/shaken-baby-syndrome-the-story-of-baby-alan

 

Vera Scheibner, Ph.D., Australian researcher, in an article reviewing the shaken baby syndrome, (Scheibner V, Nexus, Aug.-Sept, l998) stated her opinion that many of the cases attributed to this cause have actually been vaccine related injuries or deaths. After having reviewed the medical records of the present case, she came to the same conclusion. She offered the following comment in support of this opinion:

 

"Indeed, vaccines like pertussis are actually used to induce encephalitis (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) in laboratory animals.(Levine S, Am J Path, 1973) This is characterized by brain swelling and hemorrhaging of an extent similar to that caused by mechanical injuries.(Iwasa, Japan J Med Sci Biol,April, l985; Steinman L, Nature, Oct., l982)

 

In a bulletin from the National Vaccine Information Center, similar instances of mistaken diagnoses were sited; that is, instances where vaccine injuries were mistakenly diagnosed as SBS, resulting in imprisonments.(Hanchette J, NatĂ¢â‚¬â„¢l Vaccine Inf Center: http://www.909shot.comgnsshake.him)One of the instances was reviewed in the article:

 

 

"Dr. Thomas Schweller, a San Diego pediatric neurologist, who testified (in a case in which a father was accused of brain injuring his child) that the brain damage from interior bleeding was likely triggered by the DPT shot, stressed this in a Gannett New Service Interview: is a tendency in some medical arenas to discount completely the history provided by the family if you find evidence of subdural hematoma no matter what history is provided. Even a threefoot fall can cause fractures. It doesn't need to come from a shaking event. I'm always leery in medicine of saying something is always due to some factor, or that something is 100 percent."'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because straight afterwards of getting the shot, he got sick. He went from healthy, and holding down 3 jobs to not being able to do that anymore.

 

There is a link between the two. Of course they (pharmaceutical industry) deny it.

 

I'm just sharing......

 

I was reading an article just last month about correlation and causation.

 

The author of the article is a pediatrician. He had a kid come in for a shot, so he turned around to get the vaccine and when he turned back around the kid was having a seizure. And as he put it in the article, if the kid had happened to have his seizure three minutes later, everybody would have thought it was the vaccine. But it wasn't.

Sometimes, bad things happen. Sometimes they happen right after you get a vaccine. However, it is a logical fallacy (with a proper Latin name - post hoc, ergo propter hoc) to assume that because one thing happens after another, the first caused the second.

 

Humans tend to assume that's how it happens. This is because a certain level of paranoia is an evolutionary advantage. That doesn't mean that this reasoning is correct or logical.

 

He started seeing a link between recently vaccinated babies, and them hemorrhaging soon afterwards. He was required to investigate those situations, and saw a common denominator etc...

 

But surely most dead babies at that age have been "recently vaccinated", as have most babies that do not die? I mean, if, say, 90% of babies get all routine vaccinations, then we must expect that 90% of the ones which hemorrhage were vaccinated? How recently is "recently vaccinated" anyway?

 

 

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.woodmed.com/index.php/shaken-baby-syndrome-the-story-of-baby-alan

 

Vera Scheibner, Ph.D., Australian researcher, in an article reviewing the shaken baby syndrome, (Scheibner V, Nexus, Aug.-Sept, l998) stated her opinion that many of the cases attributed to this cause have actually been vaccine related injuries or deaths. After having reviewed the medical records of the present case, she came to the same conclusion. She offered the following comment in support of this opinion:

 

"Indeed, vaccines like pertussis are actually used to induce encephalitis (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) in laboratory animals.(Levine S, Am J Path, 1973) This is characterized by brain swelling and hemorrhaging of an extent similar to that caused by mechanical injuries.(Iwasa, Japan J Med Sci Biol,April, l985; Steinman L, Nature, Oct., l982)

 

In a bulletin from the National Vaccine Information Center, similar instances of mistaken diagnoses were sited; that is, instances where vaccine injuries were mistakenly diagnosed as SBS, resulting in imprisonments.(Hanchette J, NatĂ¢â‚¬â„¢l Vaccine Inf Center: http://www.909shot.comgnsshake.him)One of the instances was reviewed in the article:

 

 

"Dr. Thomas Schweller, a San Diego pediatric neurologist, who testified (in a case in which a father was accused of brain injuring his child) that the brain damage from interior bleeding was likely triggered by the DPT shot, stressed this in a Gannett New Service Interview: is a tendency in some medical arenas to discount completely the history provided by the family if you find evidence of subdural hematoma no matter what history is provided. Even a threefoot fall can cause fractures. It doesn't need to come from a shaking event. I'm always leery in medicine of saying something is always due to some factor, or that something is 100 percent."'

 

It should be noted that citing Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. looks legitimate on the surface, however, it struck me as odd that she wasn't listed as Dr. Scheibner, which may have indicated a medical background.  Ah, I thought, perhaps her degree is in biology or forensics or a similar field. Given the research for which she is being cited as an expert, that would be certainly plausible.

 

Alas, doing a very quick search on her I was disappointed to discover that her Ph.D. was in...wait for it...micropaleontology, which is a field of geology.  Please forgive me as a I find her "expert" opinion to be a bit lacking.

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you are entitled to that opinion.

 

It's really a non win situation, as the ones that do talk against it lose their credibility anyway. The *powers that be* make sure of that.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

http://www.vierascheibner.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=50:about-viera&catid=31:general&Itemid=46

 

Dr Viera Scheibner is Principal Research Scientist (Retired) with a doctorate in Natural Sciences from Comenius University in Bratislava. After an eminent scientific career in micropalaeontology during which she published 3 books and some 90 scientific papers in refereed scientific journals in Australia and overseas, she studied babiesĂ¢â‚¬â„¢ breathing patterns with the Cotwatch breathing monitor developed by her late husband Leif Karlsson in the mid 1980s. Babies had alarms after vaccination, indicating stress. This introduced her to the subject of vaccination. She then started systematically studying orthodox medical papers dealing with vaccination issues. To this day she has collected and studied more than 100000 pages of medical papers.

 

Despite such extensive research of orthodox medical papers published on vaccines over the past 100 years, she established that there is no scientific evidence that these injections of highly noxious substances prevent diseases, quite to the contrary, that they increase susceptibility to the diseases which the vaccines are supposed to prevent and also to a host of related and unrelated viral and bacterial infections. Vaccines are involved in a great number of modern ills of childhood such as immunoreactive diseases (asthma, allergies), autoimmune diseases (diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosis), cancers, leukaemia, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, behavioural and learning problems, to mention just the most important conditions.

 

 

 

Her research into vaccination has culminated so far in two books and a number of shorter and longer individual papers published in a variety of scientific and medical publications. She has also conducted frequent international lecture tours to present the results of her research to parents, health and medical professionals and anyone else who is interested. She has also provided a great number of expert witness reports for court cases relating to deaths and injuries caused by vaccines, such as so-called "shaken babyĂ¢â‚¬ syndrome

 

 

 

 

 

Curriculum Vitae

 

Revised December 2009

 

 

 

1. CONTACT DETAILS

 

Address: 178 Govetts Leap Rd. Blackheath NSW 2785

 

Telephone: +61 247 878-203

 

Fax: +61 247 878-988

 

Email: viera.scheibner@gmail.com

 

Web site: www.vierascheibner.com

 

 

 

2. PERSONAL DETAILS

 

Born 27 March 1935 in Bratislava (former Czechoslovakia, now Slovak Republic). Both parents (now departed) were employed in Law Courts. First married in 1954, two daughters. Divorced in 1976. Married for the second time in 1987. Widowed in 1994. Lived in a de facto relationship between 1975-1985 and 1994-2002. Widowed in 2002.

 

 

 

3. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION

 

1953: studied medicine at the Medical Faculty of Jan Masaryk University in Brno. Later changed to the faculty of Natural Sciences of the same university. In 1954 transferred to the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the Jan Amos Comenius University in Bratislava.

 

1958: Graduated from the Faculty of Natural Sciences, JA Comenius University in Bratislava.

 

1964: Awarded doctorate in Natural Sciences (RNDR), JA Comenius University in Bratislava.

 

1967: Habilitated as Docent (this being equivalent to the position of Senior Associate Professor in Australian and US universities), JA Comenius University, Bratislava.

 

 

 

4. EMPLOYMENT

 

1958-1961: Employed as Lecturer at the Department of Geology and Palaeontology of JA Comenius University, Bratislava. Lectured in Biology and Micropalaeontology.

 

1962-1967: Employed as Senior Lecturer at the Department of Geology and Palaeontology of JA Comenius University, Bratislava.

 

1967-1968: Employed as Docent (equal to Senior Associate Professor) at the Department of Geology and Palaentology of JA Comenius University, Bratislava.

 

1968-1987: Left former Czechoslovakia with husband and family, settled in Sydney, Australia. Employed as a Micropalaeontologist by the Geological Survey of New South Wales, Department of Mines (later re-named Department of Mineral Resources).

 

1971-1973: Research Scientist (Department of Mineral Resources).

 

1973-1976: Senior Research Scientist (Department of Mineral Resources).

 

1976-1978: Principal Research Scientist, category I.

 

1978-1981: Principal Research Scientist, category II.

 

1981-1987: Principal Research Scientist, category III.

 

1987: retired from the Department of Mineral Resources based on the Ă¢â‚¬Å“Voluntary Redundancy SchemeĂ¢â‚¬.

 

The pre-requisite for the above appointments, more particularly to that of Principal Research Scientist, required Ă¢â‚¬Å“Demonstration of a considerable world standing in oneĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s research specialtyĂ¢â‚¬.

 

 

 

5. PREVIOUS RESEARCH INTEREST AND PUBLICATIONS: 1953-1986

 

My first scientific paper in Micropalaeontology of the Cretaceous Sequences of the Carpathian Klippen Belt in Slovakia was published whilst I was still a student at the JA Comenius University in Bratislava in 1958.

 

Between 1958-1968 I published some 35 scientific papers (and one monograph) dealing with the Cretaceous and Jurassic Foraminifera of the Carpathian Klippen Belt in Slovakia.

 

Between 1968-1987 studied Cretaceous and Permian Foraminifera of the Great Australian Basin in New South Wales, and South Australian and the Carnarvon Basins in Western Australia; South Africa and the Indian Peninsula; and Permian Foraminifera of the Sydney Basin.

 

Between 1972-1976 invited to participate in the highly prestigious Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) conducted under the auspices of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (USA), in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Results of these studies are published in the Initial Reports of the DSDP. Was invited to write a Synopsis of Cretaceous Foraminifera of the Indian Ocean, published in a monograph Ă¢â‚¬Å“Synopsis of the DSDP in the Indian OceanĂ¢â‚¬.

 

Results of my scientific findings spanning almost 30 years of research have been published in further 47 papers and 2 books (monographs) in Australian and overseas (especially USA) refereed scientific journals.

 

Lectured extensively at Australian and overseas conferences.

 

* * *

 

6. PROFESSIONAL AND RESEARCH ACTIVITIES: 1987-PRESENT

 

In 1985 I met my second husband, the late Leif Karlsson, a Swedish biomedical electronics engineer specialising in patient monitoring systems, whom I suggested to develop a breathing monitor for babies.

 

Since 1987 we were both engaged in the study of babiesĂ¢â‚¬â„¢ breathing with a microprocessor breathing monitor Cotwatch developed by the late Leif Karlsson.

 

1990-1993: published a series of articles on vaccination and cot death in Natural Health Magazine.

 

1991: Invited to present the results of the data collection on babiesĂ¢â‚¬â„¢ breathing to the Second Immunisation Conference, a pro-vaccination conference organised by the Public Health Association of Australia (Canberra May 1991). An abstract of my presentation is published in the Proceedings of this conference (Ă¢â‚¬Å“Evidence of the Association between non-specific stress syndrome, DPT injections and cot deathĂ¢â‚¬.

 

Some results of these and allied studies, in which Cotwatch breathing monitor was used as a research tool collecting information on stress response in breathing, were published in a referred medical journal Ă¢â‚¬Reproductive ToxicologyĂ¢â‚¬ (1993; 7: 449-452).

 

1993: Published the book Ă¢â‚¬Å“VaccinationĂ¢â‚¬ (296 pp) which is based on an extensive study of vaccination issues as published in refereed medical journals. This book has been published in German by Hirthammer Verlag, in Dutch by Lemniscaat Publishers and in Finnish by Kustantaja Lasse Vajaranta.

 

1994: Produced a 2-hour video of my lecture on the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccination.

 

1994: The article Ă¢â‚¬Å“Embracing vaccinationĂ¢â‚¬Â¦lamentably wrongĂ¢â‚¬ published in the Chiropractic Journal (USA). Similar articles were published in other chiropractic journals. Lectured for students of chiropractic at a number of chiropractic colleges in the USA.

 

1995: Invited and accepted as an expert on vaccination and cot death by the College of Physicians Montreal (Canada) and on 11 December 1995 gave evidence on the subject of Ă¢â‚¬Å“Vaccination and Cot DeathĂ¢â‚¬ before the Disciplinary Committee of the College of Physicians Montreal (Canada) as an expert for Dr Guillaine Lanctot.

 

Since 1996 I provide expert reports for Court cases of vaccine injuries and deaths. To this day I have been asked and prepared some 90 reports for Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) cases and/or vaccine injury compensation cases in the USA, UK, Germany, Iceland, Sweden and Australia.

 

1996: Invited to deliver a luncheon talk on dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccination to the medical staff of the Research Hospital in Kansas City, MO, USA.

 

1996-1997: Several lectures at Chiropractic Colleges in the USA.

 

In 1996 I participated in the Maroochydore (Queensland, Australia) hearing of the Equal Opportunity and Anti-discrimination Commission as an expert on the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccination, and the link between vaccination and cot death.

 

1997: Followed an invitation to deliver a lecture at a seminar organised by a professional organization of Dutch medical doctors in Utrecht, Holland Ă¢â‚¬Å“Vaccination, yes or no?Ă¢â‚¬

 

1997: Invited to present a lecture on the Dangers of Vaccination by the Faculty of Nursing, Sydney University.

 

1997: Participated in a public debate on vaccination at Sydney University in Sydney.

 

1997-1998: Invited to participate in the Training Program of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), Sydney, New South Wales, as one of two expert panelists in debates on whether immunisation should or should not be mandatory, presenting the case against vaccination based on the study of published orthodox medical research.

 

1991 to 2005 published series of articles Ă¢â‚¬Å“The SIDS and Vaccination LinkĂ¢â‚¬, Ă¢â‚¬Å“The Brain Eating Bugs, the Vaccine ConnectionĂ¢â‚¬, Ă¢â‚¬Å“Shaken Baby Syndrome Ă¢â‚¬â€œ The Vaccination LinkĂ¢â‚¬, and a 2-part article on Ă¢â‚¬Å“Preservatives and Adjuvants in VaccinesĂ¢â‚¬ in the Nexus Magazine (Australia). In 2005 The Nexus Magazine in Australia and other countries reprinted my article Ă¢â‚¬Å“Dynamics of Critical Days as part of the Dynamics of Non-specific Stress Syndrome discovered during monitoring with Cotwatch Breathing MonitorĂ¢â‚¬, first published in Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (J ACNEM), December 2004.

 

1998: Invited to address the Medical (MBOG) Congress in Utrecht (Holland) on the Ă¢â‚¬Å“Effect of Vaccination on the Immune SystemĂ¢â‚¬.

 

1998: Invited to participate in a debate on vaccination convened by the organization WDDTY (Ă¢â‚¬Å“What Doctors DonĂ¢â‚¬â„¢t Tell youĂ¢â‚¬) in London, UK.

 

1999-2003: a number of Letters to the Editor, critical of vaccines, published in Medical Observer and Australian Doctor, two prominent weekly publications for Australian orthodox medical doctors.

 

2000: Published the book Ă¢â‚¬Å“Behavioural Problems in Childhood Ă¢â‚¬â€œ the Link To VaccinationĂ¢â‚¬. The book has been translated into Swedish by an organisation of parents dealing with childrenĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s health.

 

2001: Published a paper Ă¢â‚¬Å“Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis on Shaky GroundĂ¢â‚¬ in the Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (J ACNEM); 20(2): 5-8&15.

 

2003: Published a Letter requested by the Editor of the Journal Ă¢â‚¬Å“VaccineĂ¢â‚¬ (1993; 22:VI-IX) countering the personal attack on myself as a public opponent of vaccination by Leask and McIntyre.

 

2004-2005: British Medical Journal (BMJ.com Rapid Responses) published a number of my letters to the Editor Ă¢â‚¬â€œ see the enclosed list of publications.

 

Since 1994 I traveled extensively all over Australia, Europe, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, Scandinavia, the USA and Canada, holding seminars on the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccination, as documented by orthodox medical research, for parents and health and medical professionals.

 

My task is perceived as that of liaising with paediatricians and other medical experts and of evaluation of the scientific research dealing with vaccination issues in general and more particularly with mass vaccination of infants and children. I have gathered a solid, extensive and irrefutable block of scientific evidence documenting vaccines as ineffective to prevent diseases, and which time and again issued warnings about a variety of real dangers, including brain haemorrhages and other brain damage, and retinal haemorrhages and other ophthalmological injuries and including death. The biological mechanisms of these injuries are principally immunological and toxic-chemical. My task is to analyse medical records and results of medical tests of the babies adversely affected or killed by vaccination and document the damage by case examples of the same vaccine damage described in orthodox medical literature.

 

An additional major subject of my research is immunological and other non-accidental injuries in babies who suffered medication (antibiotics and pain killers) and/or birth injuries and document the damage (including death) by case examples of identical non-accidental injuries as a result of iatrogenic (doctor-caused) immune or other disorders as described in medical literature.

 

 

 

7. PUBLICATIONS

 

Papers published in medical publications

 

--------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1991. Evidence of the association between non-specific stress syndrome, DPT injections and cot death. Ă¢â‚¬Å“Immunisation: The Old and the NewĂ¢â‚¬. Proceedings of the Second National Immunisation Conference. Canbera, Public Health Association of Australia; 27-29 May 1991: 90-91.

 

Tye K, Pollard I, Karlsson L and Scheibner V. 1993. Caffeine exposure in utero increases the incidence of apnea in adult rats. Reproductive Toxicology; 7: 449-452.

 

Scheibner V. 1993. Response to Leask and McIntyreĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s attack on myself as a public opponent of vaccination. Vaccine; 22: VI-IX.

 

Scheibner V. 2007. Kawasaki Disease. Medical Veritas; 6: 1978-1996.

 

 

 

Papers published in the Natural Health Magazine

 

------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. and Karlsson L. 1991. Cot death and vaccination Link. Natural Health Magazine; 4 (5-6) Aug/Sep and Oct/Nov 1991: 2-4.

 

Scheibner V and Karlsson L. 1991. The Vaccination debate. Natural Health Magazine; 4 (5-6) Aug/Sep and Oct-Nov 191: 5-8.

 

Scheibner V. 1992. Facts about Haemophilus influenzae B vaccines. What every doctor - and all parents Ă¢â‚¬â€œ should know about. October/November 1992 :1-3.

 

Scheibner V. 1993. Cotwatch breathing monitor guards against cot death. Natural Health Magazine (December 1992-January 1993): 12e

 

Scheibner V. 1993. Should I vaccinate my child? December 1992/January 1993.

 

Scheibner V. 1993. Flu vaccination Ă¢â‚¬â€œ is it safe? June/July 1993.

 

 

 

Papers published in chiropractic journals

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1994. Embracing vaccinationĂ¢â‚¬Â¦lamentably wrong! The Chiropractic Journal (USA); October 1994:41-45.

 

Scheibner V. 1996. Chiropractic attitudes towards immunization. International Chiropractic Association (USA); September/October 1996: 45-49.

 

 

 

Books and booklets on vaccination issues

 

----------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1993. Vaccination (100 years of scientific research shows that vaccines represent a medical assault on the immune system) 296pp.

 

Scheibner V. 2000. Behavioural problems in childhood Ă¢â‚¬â€œ the link to vaccination. pp297

 

Scheibner V. 1998. Answers to the CDCĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s instructions how to counteract the anti-vaccination argument. pp. 22

 

 

 

Papers in journals dealing with health and childrenĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s issues

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1996. Vaccination. Is prevention really the best cure? Conscious Living (Health): 36-37.

 

Scheibner V. 1995. Immunisation. The Ă¢â‚¬ËœNoĂ¢â‚¬â„¢ case. Totline (Australia): 35.

 

 

 

Letters to the Editor published in British Medical Journal.com (BMJ.com) Rapid Responses:

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœUnreliability of scientific papers as evidenceĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 24 March 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœPatterns of presentation of the shaken baby syndrome may not be caused by trauma at allĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 2 April 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœStudy first, judge laterĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 28 June 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœStudy first, judge laterĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 3 July 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœSome questions for Sam Davies or anyoneĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 21 July 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœMedical folly damaging us all with support from an Ă¢â‚¬Å“assĂ¢â‚¬ Ă¢â‚¬â„¢. 23 August 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœHistory repeats itself because people forget historyĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 13 September 2004.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœGold standardsĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 8 February 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœThe Richardson HypothesisĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 9 February 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœA Fatal MisdiagnosisĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 14 February 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœA Fatal misdiagnosisĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 21 February 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœDoctors donĂ¢â‚¬â„¢t like the taste of their own medicineĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 5 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœIntramuscular, not intravenousĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 5 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœMMR and Japan: a commentary by Wakefield and StottĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 10 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœEpidemiology ainĂ¢â‚¬â„¢t epidemiology (just like oils ainĂ¢â‚¬â„¢t oils)Ă¢â‚¬â„¢. 18 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœSimply a concerned parent: Parents must do more researchĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 24 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœExisting research is revealing and accessibleĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 24 March 2005.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœHow clean is clean?Ă¢â‚¬â„¢ 3 July 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœJabbering about jabsĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 15 September 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœPoliomyelitis outbreaks after polio vaccination-medicine in practice should not ignore the past published research. 5 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœMeasles outbreaks and epidemics occur in the vaccinated, not because chiropractors and homeopaths allegedly advising parents not to vaccinate their childrenĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 6 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœWhat is really the cause of deaths in newborn infants who usually contracted pertussis from their vaccinated family members suffering whooping cough at the time of these babiesĂ¢â‚¬â„¢ birthĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 9 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœSomething wrong with the figures: there were many more reactions than 35 after 380 000 doses of Gardasil administered. 10 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœUnexplained fractures explainedĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 12 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœWho discovered why Penicillin worked?Ă¢â‚¬â„¢ 31 December 2008.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœObesity: A major problem of our timesĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 12 January 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬ËœTherapeutic useĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. 8 January 2009

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬Å“Is mandatory vaccination such a benign paternalism?Ă¢â‚¬â„¢ 20 January 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Effectiveness of larval therapy in treatment of wounds. 23 March 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Just how healthy or sick? 6 May 2009.

 

Scheibner V. The temperature of human milk. 7 May 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Homeopathy and snake oil? Study first, judge later. 31 May 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Abuse by catholic priests only? 8 June 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬Å“EasilyĂ¢â‚¬ missed? None so blind as he who will not see. 8 June 2009.

 

Scheibner V. Vital need for perennial perianal research. 10 June 2009.

 

Scheibner V. A clear indication for HIV testing? 24 November 2009.

 

 

 

Papers on vaccination issues published in the Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (J ACNEM)

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 2001. Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis Ă¢â‚¬â€œ On Shaky Ground. J ACEM; 20(2): 5-8&15.

 

Scheibner V. 2004. Dynamics of critical days as part of the dynamics of non-specific stress syndrome discovered during monitoring with Cotwatch breathing monitor. J ACNEM; 23(3)10-14.

 

 

 

Papers on vaccination issues published in Nexus Magazine (Australia):

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1991. Cot Deaths linked to Vaccination. Vol 2 (5), October-November 1991.

 

Scheibner V. 1996. Brain-Eating Bugs: The Vaccination Connection. Vol 3 (3): April-May 1996.

 

Scheibner V. 1998. Shaken Baby Syndrome: The vaccination Link. Vol 5(5): August-September 1998.

 

Scheibner V. 2001. Adverse Effects of Adjuvants in Vaccines. Part 1. Vol 8(1): December 2000-January 2001.

 

Scheibner V. 2001. Adverse Effects of Adjuvants in Vaccines. Part 2. Vol 8(2): February-March 2001.

 

Scheibner V. 2005. Vaccinations and the Dynamics of Critical Days. Vol 12 (6): October-November 2005 (reprinted from J ACNEM).

 

Scheibner V. 2009. Little-known facts about poliomyelitis vaccinations. Part 1 and 2. Nexus: June-July (30-35&81) and October-November (27-31) 2009.

 

 

 

Nexus Magazine in France and other countries re-printed the above article.

 

 

 

 

 

Letters to the Editor of Medical Observer (MO) and Australian Doctor (AD), weekly newsletter/journals for orthodox general practitioners in Australia.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Scheibner V. 1999. Ă¢â‚¬ËœVaccination challengeĂ¢â‚¬â„¢; MO; 19 March 1999: 24.

 

Scheibner V. 2001. Ă¢â‚¬ËœWhy all the fear of the measles virus?Ă¢â‚¬â„¢ MO; 9 March 2001: 33.

 

Scheibner V. 2001. Ă¢â‚¬ËœUnreal world of the pro-vaccinatorsĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. MO 6 April 2001.

 

Scheibner V. 2003. Ă¢â‚¬ËœStudy first, judge laterĂ¢â‚¬â„¢. AD; 2 May 2003.

 

Scheibner V. Ă¢â‚¬Å“Justified viewĂ¢â‚¬. AD; 9 May 2008:23.

 

Scheibner V. 2008. Ă¢â‚¬Å“GPĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s views irrelevantĂ¢â‚¬. MO; 27 June.

 

Scheibner V. 2008. Ă¢â‚¬Å“Super stoushĂ¢â‚¬. AD; 4.July:23.

 

Scheibner V. 2008. Ă¢â‚¬Å“Middle AgesĂ¢â‚¬. AD; 16 January: 15.

 

 

 

Last Updated ( Thursday, 16 June 2011 10:06 )

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really a non win situation, as the ones that do talk against it lose their credibility anyway. The *powers that be* make sure of that.

 

I'm sure that's what they want you to believe, that they had their credibility cruelly taken away from them by the machine. I bet that's what they'd like to believe as well. Far easier than believing that they lost their credibility because they practiced shoddy science.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know what you think her motivation is? As she has also provided a great number of expert witness reports for court cases relating to deaths and injuries caused by vaccines. If she didn't believe all this and had proof, why would she even bother? She cares for the parents and babies that have been affected by it all, that's why. She's putting her credibility out there to be mocked, as that doesn't hurt as bad as what a parent would go through when charged of something they never did, on top of losing their precious baby!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she didn't believe all this and had proof, why would she even bother?

 

If she has proof, I'm sure she can get it peer reviewed in the normal way.

 

She might well believe what she's selling. That doesn't make it true. We can clap all we like, but fairies still won't be real just because we believe really, really hard.

 

She cares for the parents and babies that have been affected by it all, that's why.

 

Are you suggesting that the majority of scientists in relevant fields (such as biology or medicine) who disagree with her do not care about babies? They're just blithely ignoring the evidence for the lulz?

 

To me it shows that she is willing to talk to anyone that is willing to listen.

 

And how telling that mainstream medicine isn't willing to listen to her! This isn't usually a sign of a big conspiracy. It's more often a sign of somebody who has a screw loose and doesn't really know what they're doing.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though this really needs to be understood as an 'adverse auto-immune system response' to a vaccine.

 

Our immune system responds by producing Cytokines, that seek out the foreign bodies (bacteria, viruses, etc) in cells, and then set off a process of inflammation to destroy the foreign body and remove it. 

But their is a major fault with Cytokines?

As they can mistakenly identify our own cells as foreign cells, and then set off an inflammatory response.

So that our immune system is then attacking ourselves.

 

With a vaccine, this causes the production of a really great number of  Cytokines, to develop antigens.

Which raises the chance of some Cytokines going astray and attacking our own cells?

 

Until now, it had been assumed that the brain was insulated from the Cytokines produced by vaccines.

As the 'blood-brain barrier', would prevent the vaccine cells from entering the brain.

So that the development of antigens to the vaccine, would only occur outside of the brain.

 

But some important research was published this month. 

Which has identified that our Lymph System has free access to blood vessels in the brain.

So that the Cytokines produced in body, as a response to the vaccine.

Would then be able to freely enter the brain.

http://neurosciencenews.com/lymphatic-system-brain-neurobiology-2080/

 

Where these Cytokines may then mistakenly identify random healthy brain cells, to inflame and remove.

Which can then result in random damage to brain regions.

Where the type of vaccine is really irrelevant?

It is rather an individuals auto-immune response, to a massive invasion any vaccines foreign body?

Flu shots can equally cause this.

 

Though I wonder whether the solution is to make vaccinations a 2 step process?

Which uses the allergy test model.

Which uses a 'pin-prick test' first, to test for an adverse response.

 

Where we need to develop a new vaccination process, that people have trust in.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know what you think her motivation is?

 

She is motivated to spread the news.

 

The problem is, her news isn't news, it's delusional thinking. 

 

She can be totally sincere, but it doesn't make her argument any less delusional and paranoid.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though this really needs to be understood as an 'adverse auto-immune system response' to a vaccine.

 

Our immune system responds by producing Cytokines, that seek out the foreign bodies (bacteria, viruses, etc) in cells, and then set off a process of inflammation to destroy the foreign body and remove it.

But their is a major fault with Cytokines?

As they can mistakenly identify our own cells as foreign cells, and then set off an inflammatory response.

So that our immune system is then attacking ourselves.

 

With a vaccine, this causes the production of a really great number of Cytokines, to develop antigens.

Which raises the chance of some Cytokines going astray and attacking our own cells?

 

Until now, it had been assumed that the brain was insulated from the Cytokines produced by vaccines.

As the 'blood-brain barrier', would prevent the vaccine cells from entering the brain.

So that the development of antigens to the vaccine, would only occur outside of the brain.

 

But some important research was published this month.

Which has identified that our Lymph System has free access to blood vessels in the brain.

So that the Cytokines produced in body, as a response to the vaccine.

Would then be able to freely enter the brain.

http://neurosciencenews.com/lymphatic-system-brain-neurobiology-2080/

 

Where these Cytokines may then mistakenly identify random healthy brain cells, to inflame and remove.

Which can then result in random damage to brain regions.

Where the type of vaccine is really irrelevant?

It is rather an individuals auto-immune response, to a massive invasion any vaccines foreign body?

Flu shots can equally cause this.

 

Though I wonder whether the solution is to make vaccinations a 2 step process?

Which uses the allergy test model.

Which uses a 'pin-prick test' first, to test for an adverse response.

 

Where we need to develop a new vaccination process, that people have trust in.

Thank you for this, as it shows exactly what *can* happen to the baby's brain when given vaccines.

 

How awful for those parents that get charged with harming their children, when all they did was follow doctor's orders!!! How scary for them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As they can mistakenly identify our own cells as foreign cells, and then set off an inflammatory response.

 

So that our immune system is then attacking ourselves.

 

--------------------------------------------

 

This Ă¢â€ â€˜Ă¢â€ â€˜Ă¢â€ â€˜Ă¢â€ â€˜ is what happened to my husband straight after getting the Hep. B shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does appear that there is serious research taking place regarding a possible hep B vaccine/lupus connection (there were more related articles but I can't link more than one at a time from my phone).

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19880567

Wow, thanks for this!

 

If it can happen to a grown fit man, just imagine what it can do to a tiny newborn baby!!!!

 

 

*******************************************************

 

Are these findings scientifically enough for you girls, that call me deluded by believing that it can happen????

 

Your science is sometimes not that perfect after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks for this!

 

If it can happen to a grown fit man, just imagine what it can do to a tiny newborn baby!!!!

 

 

*******************************************************

 

Are these findings scientifically enough for you girls, that call me deluded by believing that it can happen????

 

Your science is sometimes not that perfect after all.

Um...that was a scientific source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um...that was a scientific source.

My point exactly!!!! It changes continually. .....

 

So, *now* it doesn't appear to be that safe anymore. Even though other studies showed otherwise. Your own science is telling you that.

 

So, let's stop treating non vaxers with contempt. They just might have a good reason to be wary.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for this, as it shows exactly what *can* happen to the baby's brain when given vaccines.

 

How awful for those parents that get charged with harming their children, when all they did was follow doctor's orders!!! How scary for them!

I would love for someone to explain to me how this somehow only happens from vaccines, and not from the daily bombardment of germs our bodies receive.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/vaccinesPreventionOrCurse.php

 

 

http://www.vaccinesuncensored.org/outdated.php#natural

 

The mechanics of vaccination to build immunity is quite unnatural. Rather than space exposure to a relatively minuscule level of micro organisms in a gradual manner, quantities of antigens are introduced into the body through a series of vaccinations that are given in a row over a short period of time. All vaccines with the exception of the oral polio vaccine are injected directly into the bloodstream, by-passing the mucosal immune system know as the secretory IgA which is the first in a series of defensive levels within the immune system. It serves as a buffer, filtering microbes so that the impact of these invading organism is greatly reduced once it reaches the bloodstream. The IgA allows the antigen to be removed the same manner it arrived Ă¢â‚¬â€œ through the mucosal barrier by sneezing, coughing and sweating. So a vaccine that has been injected gives the body no warning, no generalized inflammatory response, no chance to recognize, duplicate or defend itself against future challenges from typical antigens."

 

 

Robert Mendelsohn, MD, Professor of Pediatrics, 'How to Raise a Healthy Child in spite of your Doctor'

 

I would love for someone to explain to me how this somehow only happens from vaccines, and not from the daily bombardment of germs our bodies receive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point exactly!!!! It changes continually. .....

 

So, *now* it doesn't appear to be that safe anymore. Even though other studies showed otherwise. Your own science is telling you that.

 

So, let's stop treating non vaxers with contempt. They just might have a good reason to be wary.

 

Again, I don't think you really grasp what science is if you seem to think that is making a point against science.

 

And FTR, the study was investigating a possible connection.  I haven't had time to do a search and see if one has been determined.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When damage happens to people over and over again, and all over the world... I really don't care if *their* studies match it, or not!

 

I believe the people that are sick and make that link. And the people that are brave and speak out- like that ex policeman and Dr Vera Schreibner etc...as they aren't in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.

 

That's just me though, and you are entitled to your opinion. I just ask you guys stop making fun of people like me that don't trust your science after having a bad experience with it etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When damage happens to people over and over again, and all over the world... I really don't care if *their* studies match it, or not!

 

I believe the people that are sick and make that link. And the people that are brave and speak out- like that ex policeman and Dr Vera Schreibner etc...as they aren't in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.

 

That's just me though, and you are entitled to your opinion. I just ask you guys stop making fun of people like me that don't trust your science after having a bad experience with it etc...

 

One can ignore all the information one wants. One can make and celebrate any links between two unrelated events one wants, plausible or random. 

 

But when one promotes anti-scientific theories on an education board, one shouldn't be surprised to find educators make corrections.

 

That's what educators do. Correct misinformation. 

 

Doing so shouldn't be mistaken for making fun of anyone. 

 

This board exists to serve home educators. It goes against all our best interests to ignore fear mongering, delusional arguments, and anti-science rhetoric. 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When damage happens to people over and over again, and all over the world... I really don't care if *their* studies match it, or not!

 

I believe the people that are sick and make that link. And the people that are brave and speak out- like that ex policeman and Dr Vera Schreibner etc...as they aren't in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.

 

That's just me though, and you are entitled to your opinion. I just ask you guys stop making fun of people like me that don't trust your science after having a bad experience with it etc...

 

And the rest of us believe those who have education in relevant fields and who are experts at the material.

 

More damage every year is done to children because they are not vaccinated than because they are.

 

You ask us to "stop making fun of people like [you]", but you continually insinuate that the rest of us just don't care about children or are too duped to understand what's "really" going on. It's really hypocritical, and it's really inappropriate.

 

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though this needs to understood as an 'adverse immune system response', that can also be triggered by a vaccination.

But it could also be triggered by the Herpes Simplex 1 virus, which a majority of the world's population carry.

Where a person can have this virus for years, and then suddenly one day it triggers an adverse immune response.

That can cause inflammation in the brain/ Encephalitis, and major brain damage.

The Streptococcus bacteria that lives in the back of most people's throat?

Can also trigger an adverse immune response, resulting in PANDAS (Paediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated with Streptococcus)

As well as the Borrelia virus from a tick bite, which generally just causes a rash.

But an adverse immune system response to it in some people, can also cause Encephalomyelitis.

 

Where the real issue, is with a compromised immune system.  

That is vulnerable to an adverse response, to any foreign bacteria or virus.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that needs to be understood is that scientists and medical practitioners are very aware that vaccines cause harm in some cases. There really is no one out there claiming that vaccines never do damage, never result in illness or even death. It happens, we know it happens, scientists and doctors track and study such issues and try to minimize them.

 

We vaccinate not because vaccines are 100% safe and effective but because they result in far, far less illness, disability, and death than do diseases circulating in the wild.

  • Like 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that needs to be understood is that scientists and medical personal are very aware that vaccines cause harm in some cases. There really is no one out there claiming that vaccines never do damage, never result in illness or even death. It happens, we know it happens, scientists and doctors track and study such issues and try to minimize them.

 

We vaccinate not because vaccines are 100% safe and effective but because they result in far, far less illness, disability, and death than do diseases circulating in the wild.

 

I liked this post but wanted to say it again.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really a non win situation, as the ones that do talk against it lose their credibility anyway. The *powers that be* make sure of that.

 

They lose their credibility by questioning years of scientific progress and using scare tactics to sell herbal supplements that have not been researched in any way by anyone. They set up shop as fear mongers when their career is no longer credible.

 

Have you seen Tenpenney today? She's blaming her own followers for the passage of the vaccination bill in CA. She is clearly irrational.

 

BTW, there is no reason the vaccine manufacturers want to continue making vaccines. They would make much, much more money treating the diseases vaccines prevent.

 

In many cases, people with sick family members look for something to blame...something to explain why their loved one no longer enjoys good health. They are rarely able to be objective. I say this as someone with multiple sick loved ones.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know what you think her motivation is? As she has also provided a great number of expert witness reports for court cases relating to deaths and injuries caused by vaccines. If she didn't believe all this and had proof, why would she even bother? She cares for the parents and babies that have been affected by it all, that's why. She's putting her credibility out there to be mocked, as that doesn't hurt as bad as what a parent would go through when charged of something they never did, on top of losing their precious baby!

 

 

Expert witnesses make money. Lots of it. Add to the fact that it raises her stature and increases traffic to her web store. Motive is $$$$$$.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...