Jump to content

Menu

Feeling discouraged about eyesight


klmama
 Share

Recommended Posts

*Sigh*  Since hitting my 40s, it seems that every. single. year. I need to get new lenses for my glasses.  I'm farsighted.  The eye doctor tells me that the process is worse for those of us who are farsighted, and that seems to be the case as my nearsighted dh is still able to wear the same lenses for years and years.  I'm just wondering if maybe, just maybe, my eye doctor might not be up on the latest info for farsighted eyes.  Have you read of any new ways to slow the vision loss process?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure it has anything to do with being farsighted. After a good 20 years of stability, since I got bifocals, I have had to get new glasses every year for a few years now.

 

I am nearsighted, so I can now work up close without my glasses, which farsighted people (or people who have had surgery) can't do.  Maybe that is what he meant by it being harder for farsighted people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have age-related vision issues.  I also have some slight issues with distance vision.  When I first got glasses I think I was around 43 or 44.  For the first two or three years I needed new ones each time I went to the optometrist.  And then it stabilized for awhile.  I'm 51 now and due for a visit, and I'm positive I need a change of prescription.  But I think it's been at least three years since I've needed new ones. I could be wrong, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that that's a fairly typical scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to start wearing glasses (astigmatism) at age 8. I always hated wearing them and went without them for quite a few years.  I could tell my vision was getting worse and started wearing bi-focals (glad they are no line-) around age 43. I had a scare about two years ago when I went in for a checkup. They found a spot on one of my eyes. My mother suggested I start taking Bausch & Lomb Ocuvite, an eye vitamin and mineral supplement. I did and when I went back the spot was gone. I'm assuming my pressure (for whatever reason) was up in my eye the day the spot was discovered. But I also didn't need to get new lenses as my eyes hadn't changed enough to warrant getting new ones. I'm hoping that the B. & L. vitamin is helping as we have eye disease that runs in the family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have my eyes checked every two years and also need bifocals. I am nearsighted and have astigmatism. I love picking out new frames every two years and am slowly building up a fun collection. Granted, that some of them have lenses that are no longer up-to-date, but it's okay since my vision doesn't change that much. I wore contacts for many years, but they began to irritate me. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also severely nearsighted and have an astigmatism, to the point that I'm legally blind without my glasses. Now whenever I get my eyes checked, they want to take a picture of my retina because I have a a risk for detachment.

 

This is me, too.  I was -9.50 before I had LASIK.  Although LASIK helped my vision, it didn't change the shape of my eye (myopic eyes are egg shaped), which means more traction on the retina from the vitreous, and more of a risk of a tear.

 

I had a floater about a month ago, and while normally DH says they're part of aging...don't worry about it unless things get worse, this time he said, "Don't make any sudden movements for 5-6 weeks, you could detach."  Lovely.  It's probably a matter of not if, but when for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm another veteran of multifocal lenses and annual prescription changes since I was 8.

 

I try to look on the bright side.  As soon as I need a new prescription, I can finally get rid of the evil-old-lady frames that I'm wearing.  It just so happens that these glasses have been awesome prescription-wise and so I've had them for a year and a half, but I am terrible at picking out frames!  I look best in rimless frames but I have a hard time finding ones that fit my small face.  My current evil-old-lady frames are technically *kid-sized*, 47-16-130.

 

It seems to help to keep in mind the vertical height of the lens when choosing for a multifocal prescription - from what I understand, taller leaves more room for the sweet spot in the middle for computer distance.  Hence why I love(/hate) my current frames.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...