Jump to content

Menu

Rainbow Science..reviews and preparation for high...


Recommended Posts

Hi Penny,

We are using RS with my 5th and 7th grade dds. We are almost through Chemistry and have completed the Physics section. We obviously don't have the exposure yet to hs sciences, but I think RS would really be more likely to help with exposure than anything else. I like that the terms in Physics and Chemistry that would seem a bit ominous in a hs text will be a bit more familiar because we have used RS. I'm still on the fence about doing year 2 or moving on to BJU for my oldest.

hth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and completed the entire course in one year instead of two. I also supplemented the course with videos and other sources (I also had them write papers). Anyway, my dd completed this as an 8th grade course last year and this year she is taking AP Biology and has an "A" average in the class. My dd is a very hardworking student, very self-motivated so I'm don't know that I would recommend this approach for everybody (my ds will not follow in his sister's footsteps, he's simply not ready for that level of work).

 

Just my $.02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and found it short and to the point. The experiments really illustrate the concepts well. My older son used it in middle school and is now on high school Physics. He hasn't had any trouble with high school science.

 

My younger son is using it this year (6th) and will continue with it for 7th grade, too. He really enjoys the sense of humor the author brings to the textbook. Following most lessons, there are just a few questions to be answered. My son is learning how to answer in complete sentences and explain concepts in writing without being overwhelmed with a page of 10 questions/lesson.

 

I met Jay Wile at a convention many years ago and asked him whether he thought Rainbow Science (whose booth was around the corner) would be a good preparation for his high school courses. He said that he thought it would provide a good preparation for his high school courses. He said that middle school students who preferred a lot of reading would like his course better and that those who preferred a more hands-on approach would like Rainbow better. We have found that to be true in our experience.

 

HTH,

Brenda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My children will be in grades 6 and 4 next year. I recommended this to a friend a few year's ago when I first heard of it (I really didn't know anything about it!) and she bought it for her children. I think she used it when her kids were in grades 7 & 5, and then continuing over the next two years. She LOVES LOVES LOVES it. Oh, and she really loves it! Her younger children (grades 1 and down) love sitting in on the experiments.

 

So, now I'm looking into purchasing it for next year. DH will do it with the kids (I HATE chem & physics) and I'll continue the science stuff from years one and two (you know, human body, astronomy, etc). I'm really excited about buying it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're in chemistry, too, with my 8th-grade son, but we're augmenting...we've read a separate book on the periodic table, and we're using the PH books (Chemical Building Blocks currently) to add more information. I think Rainbow is a good overview, but it's not as detailed as the PH books, for example (although the labs are easier for me, a non-science mom, to figure out than the PH ones, which is why we're using it...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was our first formal "curriculum" for science and we used it in 7/8th grades. My purpose in using it was to make sure the vocabulary was there for high school science and to make sure we had "no holes" in our knowledge base - I would say it definitely did that.

 

My youngest is finishing it up this year and my oldest is in high school Chemistry. Both are doing very well.

 

Susie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all SO much! I feel much better about this.

 

I guess it is difficult for me to make a decision on this because I LIKE how the Prentice Hall books are very indepth and cover the areas (over middle school) with a good depth of knowledge and not just skim the surface. We haven't done any formal science (just reading basically) until this year (5th) with Exploration Education.

 

My friend is VERY science-y, majored in science and taught middle school science so her boys are getting hard core science from 3rd grade on up. I'm just afraid that if we don't take this "hard core" approach that my guys will be "lost in the dust" when we come to harder books/levels in high school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bev, Was it difficult to complete both levels within one year? I think my ds falls between your ds and dd (the way you descibe them). He CAN be very motivated when he enjoys something (and he does like science), but sometimes I'm finding he isn't ready for some levels of work that I think he is, so he balks.

P

 

and completed the entire course in one year instead of two. I also supplemented the course with videos and other sources (I also had them write papers). Anyway' date=' my dd completed this as an 8th grade course last year and this year she is taking AP Biology and has an "A" average in the class. My dd is a very hardworking student, very self-motivated so I'm don't know that I would recommend this approach for everybody (my ds will not follow in his sister's footsteps, he's simply not ready for that level of work).

 

Just my $.02[/quote']

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Susie, which Chemistry course are you using with your oldest? Did you do Biology and which course?

 

Thanks (just doing some thinking here).

 

It was our first formal "curriculum" for science and we used it in 7/8th grades. My purpose in using it was to make sure the vocabulary was there for high school science and to make sure we had "no holes" in our knowledge base - I would say it definitely did that.

 

My youngest is finishing it up this year and my oldest is in high school Chemistry. Both are doing very well.

 

Susie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Susie:iagree:. We used Rainbow when the kids were 4th/6th and 5th/7th. I hadn't intended the younger one to do it with us but he followed along very well. My older ds went on to do high school biology in 8th (he got an A- in an outside lab) and had no trouble with the A Beka 10th grade-level bio text. He is doing the Spectrum Chemistry this year and doing very well. My kids enjoy science but I wanted to keep it hands-on and fun, not boring and book-y so that is why we went with Rainbow. Your kids will not be left in the dust in high school science! Those texts are meant to be picked up with no previous exposure to the subject. I think Rainbow provides a great intro to the methods and vocabulary of science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My school year is 40 weeks, so we were able to do each section in 10 week increments. It also depends on your supplements. I really didn't feel the program was strong enough by itself. By middle school, students should be writing reports, so I had my dc writing reports (historical figures in science, lab reports, etc.) You could also add in a science fair project.

 

HTH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...